Biological Activity of Avocado By-Products: A Review Focusing on Farm Animals’ Health

 

José Luis Guil-Guerrero

Food Technology Division, Agrifood Campus of International Excellence, ceiA3, University of Almería, E-04071, Almería, Spain

Corresponding author: jlguil@ual.es; ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2666-17

Received 18 February 2022; Accepted 30 April 2022; Published 26 May 2022

 

Abstract

 

The avocado industries produce a large amount of waste, which constitutes a threat to the environment. In this work, the complete set of bioactive compounds from avocado by-products (AP), their biological activities, and the experimentation accomplished using AP in farm animals’ diets are reviewed. AP, that is seeds and peels, are raw sources of phenolic compounds (flavanol monomers, procyanidins, and hydroxycinnamic acids), furan derivatives, aliphatic acetogenins (which have antimicrobial and spore germination inhibiting effects), carotenoids, phytates, polyols, and sterols. Moreover, AP contain valuable nutrients (proteins, lipids, and carbohydrates) that could effectively contribute to farm animals’ diets. Among the biological properties of AP, highlight their antimicrobial, antioxidant, and anti-inflammatory ones. Ill effects of avocado by-products seem to be animal species-dependent, given that AP has been cited as conditionally toxic for some animals. Conversely, feeding AP has positive effects on pigs, and these have been used successfully to feed goats and sheep, and in aquaculture. To use AP as livestock feed, the excessive amount of bioactive compounds could be decreased by hydrothermal treatment. This was successfully applied to avocado seeds to reduce bioactive compounds and fiber contents to safe levels. Overall, AP could be used for extracting healthy compounds to be used as nutritional supplements, and for improving the health of selected farm animals. Furthermore, AP-derived compounds could be useful in reducing the emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria, which has been linked to the abusive use of antibiotics when used as growth promoters in farm animals' production. © 2022 Friends Science Publishers

 

Keywords: Avocado by-products; Phenolics; Furans; Acetogenins; Antioxidant; Farm animals

 


Introduction

 

Avocado (Persea Americana Mill.) is the most important crop within the Laurel family (Lauraceae). This tropical tree produces an oily fruit used by indigenous people for at least 9,000 years and obtained in the wild in Meso-America, which was appreciated by Mayan and Aztec civilizations (Storey et al. 1986). Today, this fruit is quickly distributed in all regions of the world due to its favorable nutrient properties: it contains a large amount of monounsaturated fatty acids (FA) and valuable quantities of vitamins, minerals, and phytochemicals (Schaffer and Wolstenholme 2013). The fruits of avocado are mainly used for human consumption and to produce cosmetics, nutritional supplements, and livestock feed. The avocado pulp is generally used for culinary purposes, while the seeds and peels are usually disposed of by landfilling. In 2019, the world avocado production was 7,308,978 Tm (FAO, 2019), and from this production, the avocado by-products (AP) accounted for ~54.8% (wet basis) (Negesse et al. 2009). Historically, avocado seeds have been used in traditional Mesoamerican medicine for the treatment of rheumatism, asthma, various infectious diseases, and also for diarrhea and dysentery induced by intestinal parasites (Jiménez-Arellanes et al. 2013).

The criteria for designing feed formulas are based on improving body weight (BW), feed conversion efficiency, protein accretion, and milk and egg production. Regrettably, all criteria focus on productivity rather than on achieving healthy animals, and for this antibiotics are used (Guil-Guerrero et al. 2016a). This use is intended to avoid gastrointestinal infections and inflammatory bowel diseases. However, antibiotics are often misused in animal production farms, and thus antibiotic residues appear in the environment (Guil-Guerrero et al. 2016b). For avoiding this excessive use, plant-food by-products can be introduced into the diet of farm-animal, as these contain suitable concentrations of plant-derived compounds with antimicrobial and health-enhancing properties (Guil-Guerrero et al. 2016c).

A major problem with AP used as food or feed supplements is that although they contain protein and carbohydrates, the high concentration of polyphenols contained in it confers a bitter taste and can reach toxicity at high levels (Domínguez et al. 2014). However, their use in mixes with other plant food by-products or feed will reduce such flavor to acceptable limits, while providing interesting amounts of bioactive compounds for health promotion.

Previously, AP were partially reviewed about phenolic compounds content, and some biological activities, such as antioxidant ones (Araújo et al. 2018). However, despite the wide research carried out on the biochemical composition and biological activities of AP, as well as the studies on its use as animal feed, still, all this research remains un-reviewed as a whole. The present review discusses all relevant data about AP, focusing on their biochemical composition and related health benefits for farm animals, while potential directions for future studies are provided.

 

Biochemical composition and health benefits of avocado by-products

 

Approximately, 100 g of fresh fruits generate 1216 g of peel and 1424 g of seeds (Bressani et al. 2009); thus, finding new uses for this by-product is a desirable action. Considering the seeds, it highlights their protein content, which is highly dependent on processing methodology, ranging from 6.24 to 23.54 g·100 g-1 (Talabi et al. 2016). The seeds also contain healthy fatty acids (FA), and the FA profiles of three avocado varieties (Fuerte, Bacon, and Hass) were studied in Japan by Takenaga et al. (2008). The main FA in seeds were linoleic acid (LA, 18:2n-6) (35.338.2% of total FA), oleic acid (OA, 18:1n-9) (22.422.1% of total FA), and palmitic acid (PA, 16:0) (17.717.9% of total FA). These FA percentages are similar to those reported by Alkhalf et al. (2019).

Phytochemical studies on AP identified various classes of natural products: phenolic compounds, phytosterols, polyols, furan derivatives, acetogenins, carotenoids, abscisic acid, lignans, glucosides, as well as FA and hydroxylated ones. The levels of such compounds vary according to avocado variety, farming variables, and ripeness. Measured levels are also influenced by the method of extraction during experimentation.

Phenolics occur both in peels and seeds of avocado fruits and comprise phenolic acids (Fig. 1), phenolic alcohol derivatives (Fig. 2), flavonoids (Fig. 3), and procyanidins (oligomeric tannins, Fig. 4). Total phenolic amounts deeply differ between avocado peels and seeds (Table 1). Considering total phenolics reported as gallic acid equivalent (GAE), in avocado peels these ranged from 1.40–18.94 g·kg-1 FW (Ramos-Aguilar et al. 2021) to 527.8 g GAE·kg-1 DW (Rosero et al. 2019), while total phenolics in seeds ranged from 0.30 g GAE·kg-1 g DW in cv. Criollo spp. (Cid-Pérez et al. 2021) to 292 g GAE·kg-1 DW in avocado seeds (Pahua-Ramos et al. 2012). In AP, flavonoids showed low figures, but tannins occur in amounts similar to those of phenolic acids (Lee et al. 2008), and anthocyanins showed variable amounts in peels (Ashton et al. 2006).

Phenolic profiles are summarized in Table 2. The peels extracts contain a great variety of phenolic acids, such as hydroxycinnamic and hydroxybenzoic ones, and some flavonoids such as quercetin and catechin. The seed extracts contain mainly hydroxycinnamic acids, and flavonoids such as epicatechin catechin, and procyanidins. Summarized phenolic acids show interesting properties for human health and achieving a more sustainable and cleaner animal production. Simple phenolic acids have antibacterial actions, for instance against Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Listeria monocytogenes. Saavedra et al. (2010) described synergy between streptomycin and phenolic acids against Gram-bacteria. Wen et al. (2003) indicated that phenolic acids mixtures have additive antilisterial effects, and reported a significant relationship between pH and antilisterial activity. Cueva et al. (2010) stated that phenolic acids act as growth inhibitors of several lactobacilli species and some pathogens (S. aureus and Candida albicans), but P. aeruginosa was not affected by these compounds. Flavonoids are secondary polyphenolic metabolites that have a ketone group and yellowish pigments, and the ones contained in AP have antibacterial activity. Such compounds have been successfully tested against oxacillin-resistant S. aureus, cariogenic Streptococcus mutans, and uropathogenic E. coli. The mechanisms related to the bacterial growth inhibition were diverse, e.g., destabilization of the cytoplasmic membranes and the deprivation of the substrates required for microbial growth, such as Fe and Zn (via chelation of molecules with these metals), and such depletion can severely limit bacterial growth (Dixon et al. 2005; Heinonen 2007). Other interesting phenolics are procyanidins, which are catechin- and epicatechin-oligomeric compounds, which exhibit chemoprotective properties against cancer (Jeong and Kong 2004), improve lipid metabolism (Puiggros et al. 2005), prevent infections in the urinary tract, and can modulate antioxidant enzymatic activities (Puiggros et al. 2005), among other bioactivities.

Tannins, i.e., water-soluble polyphenols, occur in avocado peel (Table 1, Negesse et al. 2009). These compounds, which have high molecular weight and many phenolic groups, are able to precipitate protein (Hagerman et al. 1998). Tannins affect rumen bacteria by inactivating several enzymes, e.g., glutamate dehydrogenase, proteases, and carboxymethyl cellulase. Furthermore, sulfur and iron bioavailability is limited to animals that consume tannin-rich tissues, thus, large consumption of tannins can induce toxicity (Kumar and Vaithiyanathan 1990). The phenolic compounds contained in AP are of great interest considering that these have high diversity, and therefore a synergistic antibacterial action due to such compounds can be expected through the consumption of AP, which could help to prevent many digestive pathologies in farm animals.

 

Fig. 1: Phenolic acids contained in avocado by-products

 

 

Fig. 2: Phenolic alcohol derivatives contained in avocado by-products


The occurrence of other compounds in AP is summarized in Table 3. Furan derivatives (Fig. 5) were found in seeds by Ding et al. (2007). These compounds have been subjected to structural modifications, and antibacterial, antifungal, and insecticidal activities were checked with positive results (Rodríguez-Saona and Trumble 2000). Aliphatic acetogenins, also known as “hydroxylated fatty alcohols”, were reported by Kashman et al. 1969a, b, which constitute a class of compounds almost exclusively isolated from avocado (Fig. 6). These have antimicrobial, antibacterial and spore germination inhibiting effects (Hernández-Brenes et al. 2013), and anti-inflammatory properties were cited for the acetogenins isolated from avocado seeds (Fig. 6, compounds 711) (Rosenblat et al. 2011). Carotenoids were found in peels of Hass variety by Ashton et al. (2006). These comprise β-carotene, neoxanthin, violaxanthin, zeaxanthin, and α- and β-carotene (Fig. 7). These compounds have a great interest in animal health since carotenoids influence both cellular and humoral immunity, thus these can be used to prevent infectious and inflammatory processes. Furthermore, recent investigations on the role of carotenoids in angiogenesis, apoptosis, and gene regulation, revealed mechanisms of immune system regulation (Pechinskii and Kuregyan 2014). Polyols (ascorbic acid, mannoheptulose, and perseitol, among others), were reported by Tesfay et al. (2010) in avocado peels and seeds (Figs. 8, 9), and the latter was also found in Hass avocado peels by Figueroa et al. (2018). The consumption of such compounds has health effects on young monogastric mammals, which exhibited an increased survival rate, both over the intermediate portions of the pre-weaning period and over the entire pre-weaning period (Rodas et al. 2015). Avocado-derived compounds containing polyols, comprising D-mannoheptulose and/or perseitol, have been proposed for treating and preventing innate immunity modification diseases by increasing the production of antimicrobial peptides (e.g., Human β-defensin-2), without inducing inflammatory reactions, irritation, or intolerance (Piccirilli et al. 2015). Sterols (Fig. 10) occur mainly in the unsaponifiable obtained from the avocado peel, which contains 0.2% of saturated aliphatic hydrocarbons and more than 1% of sterols (Msika et al. 2013). This unsaponifiable includes stigmasterol, ß-sitosterol, campesterol, Δ5-avenasterol, Δ7-stigmasterol, and citrostadienol. Alkhalf et al. (2019) reported in avocado seeds cholesterol, stigmasterol, and β-sitosterol. Sterols-rich by-products could have interest in improving animal health since such compounds positively affect the wellness and health of farm animals through a variety of physiological

 

Fig. 3: Flavonoids contained in avocado by-products

 

 

Fig. 4: Procyanidins contained in avocado by-products

 

functions, e.g., antitumor effects, hormone-like actions, oxidation and inflammation resistance, immune modulation, and in vivo growth regulation (Guil-Guerrero et al. 2016a). Avocado seeds contain a lipid fraction in which occurs some FA as LA, OA, and PA, which store energy, while LA is an essential nutrient and OA is a bioactive compound (Takenaga et al. 2008). Besides these, other organic acids are present in avocado by-products, which are depicted in Fig. 11. Hass avocado peels contain quinic, citric, malic, and succinic acids (Figueroa et al. 2018), while two glycosylated abscisic acid derivates were isolated from seeds (Ramos et al. 2004). These molecules have been assayed in abscisic acid-fed mice and typified as healthy, since they decrease blood glucose concentrations in fasting, ameliorate glucose tolerance, adipocyte hypertrophy, tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) expression, and macrophage infiltration, which were significantly improved (Guri et al. 2007). Therefore, such molecules could have positive health effects on farm animals, although the extent of this effect remains unknown. In addition to all the above-detailed compounds, Figueroa et al. (2018) found in avocado peels a lignan (nudiposide) and

Table 1: Total phenolics, anthocyanin, and flavonoids in avocado by-products

 

Variety

Seed

Peel

Reference

Total phenolics

Hass, Gwen, Fuerte

16.5-29.8 g GAE·kg-1 g FW

-

Torres et al. (1987)

-

88.2 g GAE·kg-1 DW

-

Soong and Barlow (2004)

Several cultivars

19.2-51.6 g GAE.kg-1 FW

4.3-113.9 g GAE·kg-1 FW

Wang et al. (2010)

Hass

17.0–60.8 g GAE·kg-1 g DW

32.9–90.0 g GAE·kg-1 g DW

Rodríguez-Carpena et al. (2011)

Fuerte

20.3–69.1 g GAE·kg-1 DW

40.5–172.2 g GAE kg--1 DW

Rodríguez-Carpena et al. (2011)

-

7.20 g GAE·kg-1 g FW

8.39 g GAE kg-1 g FW

Deng et al. (2012)

Hass

9.51 g CE·kg-1 DW

25.32g CE·kg-1 DW

Kosińska et al. (2012)

Shepard

13.04 g CE·kg-1 DW

15.61 g·CE·kg-1 DW

Kosińska et al. (2012)

-

292 g GAE·kg-1 DW

-

Pahua-Ramos et al. (2012)

-

29.37 g GAE·kg-1 g DW

30.01 g GAE·kg-1 g DW

Oboh (2013)

Hass

57.3 g·GAE·kg-1 g DW

63.5 g·GAE kg-1 g DW

Daiuto et al. (2014)

-

1.553 g GAE·kg-1 g DW

12.523 g·GAE kg-1 g DW

Morais et al. (2015)

Hass

5.7 g GAE·kg-1 g DW

19.7 GAE·kg-1 g DW

Calderón-Oliver et al. (2016)

Hass

72.5 g·kg-1

227 g·kg-1

Melgar et al. (2018)

-

12.52-33.23 g GAE·kg-1 DW

12.42-31.10 g GAE·kg-1 DW

Saavedra et al. (2017)

Hass

57.3 g GAE·kg-1 DW

63.5 g GAE·kg-1 DW

Tremocoldi et al. (2018)

Fuerte

59.2 g GAE·kg-1DW

120.3 g GAE·kg-1 DW

Tremocoldi et al. (2018)

Nariño

328.8 g GAE·kg-1 DW

527.8 g GAE·kg-1 DW

Rosero et al. (2019)

cv. Criollo sp.

0.30g GAE·kg-1 g DW

-

Cid-Pérez et al. (2021)

Pinkerton

124 GAE·kg-1 FW·min-1

352 GAE·kg-1 FW·min-1

Skenderidis et al. (2021)

Hass and Hass type cv.

-

1.40–18.94 g GAE·kg-1 FW

Ramos-Aguilar et al. (2021)

Hass

2 mg·kg-1 DW

2-9 mg·kg-1 DW

Tesfay et al. (2010)

Total flavonoids

-

5.69 mg TE·kg-1

13.60 mg TE·kg-1

Lee et al. (2008)

-

2.32 g QE·kg-1 g DW

3.39 g QE·kg-1 g DW

Oboh (2013)

Hass

2.8 g QE·kg-1 DW

10.9 g QE·kg-1 DW

Calderón-Oliver et al. (2016)

Total tannins

-

137.2 mg TE·kg-1 FW

223.45 mg TE·kg-1 FW

Lee et al. (2008)

-

-

49 g TE·kg-1 DW

Non tannin 10; tanin 39

Condensed tannin 22.1

Negesse et al. (2009)

Hass

0.09 g GAE·kg-1g DW

0.04 g GAE·kg-1g DW

Calderón-Oliver et al. (2016)

Total anthocyanins

Hass

-

0-230 g·kg-1 FW, as cyanidin 3-O-glucoside

Ashton et al. (2006)

Abbreviations: CE: catechin equivalent; DW: dry weight; FW: fresh weight; GAE: gallic acid equivalent; QE: quercetin equivalent; TE: tannic acid equivalent

 

 

Fig. 5: Furans contained in avocado by-products

 

Table 2: Phenolic compounds occurrence in avocado by-products

 

Variety

Seeds

Peels

Reference

Several cultivars

Procyanidins: 23.7-55.6 kg-1 FW

Procyanidins 4.9-38.9 g GAE·kg-1 FW

Wang et al. (2010)

Has

Procyanidins > hydroxycinnamic acids > catechins > hydroxybenzoic acids

procyanidins> hydroxycinnamic acids> catechins

Rodríguez-Carpena et al. (2011)

Fuerte

Procyanidins > hydroxycinnamic acids > catechins

Procyanidins > catechins > hydroxycinnamic acids > hydroxybenzoic acids

Rodríguez-Carpena et al. (2011)

 

-

Epicatechin 219.2, gallic acid 52.0 mg·kg-1 DW

Catechin 520.8, chlorogenic acid 116.8, homogentisic acid 113.6, cyanidin 3-glucoside 31.6 mg·kg-1 DW

Deng et al. (2012)

Has

Catechin/epicatechin gallate 152.8, procyanidin trimer A (II) 89.3, procyanidin trimer A (I) 81.7 mg·kg-1 DW

Catechin 148.8, procyanidin dimer B (I) 135.4, chlorogenic acid 81.8, quercetin-3-O-arabinosyl-glucoside 80.4 mg·kg-1 DW

Kosińska et al. (2012)

Shepard

Catechin/epicatechin gallate 105.4, procyanidin trimer A (I) 98.9, procyanidin trimer A (II) 73, 3-O-caffeoylquinic acid 53.5 mg CE·kg-1 DW

Quercetin 3-O-galactoside 144.1, quercetin derivative (III) 81.9,

quercetin-3-O-arabinoside 94.1, quercetin derivative (I) 63.7 mg CE·kg-1 DW

Kosińska et al. (2012)

 

-

Protocatechuic 128.1, kaempferide 107.42, rutin 9.63, vainillic acid 28.67, syringic acid 2.51, kaempferol 2.19, chlorogenic acid 0.516 mg·kg-1 DW

 

-

Pahua-Ramos et al. (2012)

-

-

 

Catechin hydrate 1.71 mg·kg −1 DW

Epicatechin 1.298 mg·kg −1 DW

Morais et al. (2015)

Hass

3-O-Caffeoylquinic acid 19 mg, B-type (epi)catechin 12 mg, epicatechin 46.5 mg·kg-1 extract

4- and 5-O-Caffeoylquinic acid 40.9, epicatechin 46.5, catechin 20, B-type (epi)catechin 96, quercetin 7 mg·kg-1 extract

Melgar et al. (2018)

 

Catechin 242.6, chlorogenic acid 160.7, caffeic acid 136.9, ferulic acid 0.87 mg·kg-1 DW

Chlorogenic acid 1376, p-Coumaric acid 17.4, ferulic acid 50.5 mg·kg-1 DW

Saavedra et al. (2017)

Hass

 

 

-

Hydroxybenzoic acids: benzoic, p-hydroxybenzoic protocatechuic, gentisic acids.

Hydroxycinnamic acids: caffeic acid, caffeoylquinic acids derivatives, p-coumaric acid.

Flavanoids: naringenin, luteolin 7-O-(2″-O-pentosyl) hexoside, quercetin, quercetin glucosides, kaempferol glucosides, cinchonain I.

Procyanidin dimers, trimers and tetramers.

Lignans: nudiposide.

Figueroa et al. (2018)

Hass

Trans-5-O-caffeoyl-D-quinic acid 1.63 mg·kg-1;

Procyanidin B1 1.52 mg·kg-1; catechin 3.64 μg·mg-1; epicatechin 10.27 mg·kg-1 DW

Procyanidin B2 48.38 μg·mg-1, epicatechin 40.21 mg·kg-1 DW

Tremocoldi et al. (2018)

Fuerte

Trans-5-O-caffeoyl-D-quinicacid 5.74 mg·kg-1; procyanidin B1 2.27 mg·kg-1; catechin 8.13 mg·kg-1; epicatechin 11.06 mg·kg-1 DW

Procyanidin B2 28.34 mg·kg-1; epicatechin 30.40 mg·kg-1 DW

 

Tremocoldi et al. (2018)

 

Nariño

Flavonols, catechins, hydroxycinnamic acids, quercetin glycosides and procyanidins, phloridzin

Flavonols, catechins, hydroxycinnamic acids, quercetin glycosides, procyanidins, phloridzin

Rosero et al. (2019)

Hass and “Hass type”

 

Chlorogenic acid (0.13-0.91), procyanidin B2 (0.29-5.86), Epicatechin (0.24-2.17), cyanidin 3-O-glucoside (0.09-0.83) g·kg-1 FW

Ramos-Aguilar et al. (2021)

Abbreviations: DW: dry weight; FW: fresh weight; GAE: gallic acid equivalent; RE: rutin equivalent; TE: tannic acid equivalent; QE: quercetin equivalent

 

 

two glucosides: the iridoid-type penstemide, and (1′S, 6′R)-8′-hydroxyabscisic acid β-d-glucoside, as well as hydroxylated FA. Phytates were described in avocado peels by Negesse et al. (2009). Phytic acid (Fig. 12), is the main storage form of phosphorus (P) in several plant tissues, especially bran and seeds, where it is found as phytate, including Mg, Ca, Na, and K. As phytate form, P is not available to humans and non-ruminant animals because they lack the digestive enzyme phytase, which releases phosphate from the inositol in the phytate molecule. This situation is different from that of ruminants, which can digest phytate with the aid of the phytase that several microorganisms produced in the rumen (Klopfenstein et al. 2002). Phytate can form complexes with protein, which are pH-dependent. Such complexes reduce the bioavailability of several mineral elements (Pallauf and Rimbach 1997). However, phytic acid can induce positive actions, for instance through the prevention of the formation of free radicals and by the reduction of the risk of high-fat diet-induced hyperglycemia via regulation of hepatic glucose enzyme activities (Kim et al. 2010). Phytic acid also decreases plasma triglycerides and cholesterol and induces a change in the carryover of heavy metals (Pallauf and Rimbach 1997).

All the reviewed compounds develop antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, and immunity-promoting actions, so the intake of PA would contribute to improving the health of the digestive tract of farm animals.

 

Biological activity of avocado by-products

 

Information on this topic is summarized in Table 4, the selected antimicrobial activity of avocado by-products extracts is detailed in Table 5, while information related to antioxidant properties is described in Table 6.

 

Antidiabetic, anti-inflammatory, antihepatotoxic, anti-toxic, and antihypertensive

These assays were accomplished through in vitro cell cultures and mice models. Uchenna et al. (2017), using a murine model demonstrated the effectiveness of raw avocado seeds against hyperglycemia and/or hypercholesteremia, while the seed extracts were characterized as antihypertensive and antihepatotoxic in Wistar rats by Imafidon and Amaechina (2010). Protection against UVB-induced damage and inflammation of the skin was reported by Rosenblat et al. (2011), who in vitro supplied polyhydroxylated fatty alcohols to keratinocytes from avocado seeds prior to UVB exposure. These compounds were able to reduce increasing cell viability and enhance DNA repair while decreasing the secretion of PGE2 and IL-6, thus PFA can act as photoprotective agents. Good anti-inflammatory activities of peel and seeds were reported for Hass and Fuerte varieties by Tremocoldi et al. (2018), and the main finding was that phenolic compounds-rich peel extracts were able to suppress the release of TNF-α and NO. Moreover, gastric ulcer can be prevented by seed extracts. Alkhalf et al. (2019) found that avocado peel extract was appropriate to reduce edema in mice at 10 g·kg-1 BW, while the prevention of gastric ulcers due to oxidative stress was reported by Athaydes et al. (2019), who indicated a reduction of lipid peroxidation and an increasing of superoxide dismutase (SOD) enzyme activity. Anti-toxic and cardioprotective effects of the AE and EE of avocado seeds against doxorubicin (DOX)-induced toxicity were checked in a mice model by Shamlan (2020). Interestingly, avocado extracts mitigated the increased markers of cardiac dysfunction induced by DOX treatment.

Table 3: Other compounds occurring in avocado by-products

 

 

 

Variety

Seed

Peel

Reference

 

-

Abcisic acid

 

-

Ramos et al. (2004)

Hass

 

 

-

Carotenoids: total: 18-50; lutein: 10-21; β-carotene: 5-12; neoxanthin: 2-5 g·kg-1 FW. Others: anteraxanthin, violaxanthin, zeaxanthin, α-carotene.

Total chlorophylls: 100-210 g·kg-1 FW

Ashton et al. (2006)

-

Alkanols, terpenoids, glycosides, furan ring derivatives, and a coumarin.

 

-

Ding et al. (2007)

-

Glycolipids, phospholipids

-

Takenaga et al. (2008)

Hass

Ascorbic acid: 12.6-22.7

Mannoheptulose: 5.34-7.95

Perseitol: 0.43-1.62 g·kg-1 DW

-

Tesfay et al. (2010)

-

-

Phytathe 9 mg TE·kg-1 DW

Negesse et al. (2009)

Avocado, several cultivars

Total carotenoids 0.7-6.3 mg kg-1 FW

 

Total carotenoids 9.3-17.7 mg kg-1 FW

Wang et al. (2010)

Ettinger

Hydroxylated fatty alcohols, including persin

 

-

Rosenblat et al. (2011)

Hass

Hydroxylated fatty alcohols

 

Rodríguez-Sánchez et al. (2013)

-

1% sterols of unsaponifiable wt

Sterols: ß-sitosterol, campesterol, stigmasterol, Δ5-avenasterol, Δ7-stigmasterol, citrostadienol

-

-

Msika et al. (2013)

Hass

 

 

-

Organic acids: citric, malic, quinic, succinic.

Polyols: perseitol.

Glucosides: Iridoid-type: penstemide; and (1′S, 6′R)-8′-hydroxyabscisic acid β-d-glucoside.

Hydroxylated fatty acids

Figueroa et al. (2018)

 

-

Fatty acids: mainly, linoleic, oleic and palmitic acids.

Hydrocarbons: C18-C30, squalene.

Sterols: cholesterol, stigmasterol and β-sitosterol.

 

-

Alkhalf et al. (2019)

Criollo sp.

Isoprenoids derivates, esters of fatty acids and their derivatives

 

Cid-Pérez et al. (2021)

Hass and Hass type cv.

 

Polyols, including perseitol and volemitol

Organic acids: succinic, citric, malic, quinic, fumaric, oxalic.

Sterols: β-sitosterol, stigmasterol, campesterol, cycloartenol;

α- and δ-tocopherols

Fatty acids: mainly oleic, linoleic, palmitic

α- and δ-tocopherols; chlorophylls and pheophorbides; carotenoids (lutein and others)

Ramos-Aguilar et al. (2021)

 

Antitumor

 

These experiments were carried out using both peels and seeds. All trials were accomplished using cancer cell lines cultures, and cell growth inhibition by the MTT test was the more frequent antitumor assay. Alkhalf et al. (2019) found inhibition of the growth of hepatocellular and colon cancer cells by the lipid extracts of avocado peels. Dabas et al. (2019) checked methanol extracts (ME) for in vitro antitumor tests using several human cell lines, and a reduction in the viability of cells was found due to that ME downregulate the expression of cyclin D1 and E2, and the nuclear translocation of nuclear factor 𝜅B. Vo et al. (2019) found that the EE of seeds inhibited cancer cells growth and provided protection against H2O2-induced DNA damage and that AVM acts against NO production from cells. All these works concluded that avocado seeds constitute a raw source of healthy compounds and that these extracts can be used as ingredients for functional foods formulations.

Table 4: Biological activity of avocado by-products

 

Activity

Model

Variety

Extracted material

Test

Results

Concluding remarks

Reference

Antidiabetic

Sprague Dawley rats

Spontaneous hypertensive rats

-

Raw seeds

Feeding avocado seeds

Avocado seeds lowered blood glucose and cholesterol and enhance liver glycogen storage

Possible uses of avocado seeds against hyperglycemia and/or hypercholesteremia.

Uchenna et al. (2017)

Antihepatotoxic

Wistar rats

Fuerte

Seeds AE

NaCl-treated rats

 

-AE reduce weight gain and blood pressure

- AE reduces alkaline phosphatase activity

AE are antihypertensive and antihepatotoxic

Imafidon and Amaechina (2010)

Anti-inflammatory

In vitro cell cultures

-

Seeds PFA

In vitro keratinocytes cultures

Decreased IL-6 and cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers after UV-B radiation

PFA reduce UV-B-induced inflammation in skin

Rosenblat et al. (2011)

 

Mice model

-

Peels and seeds lipid extracts

Carrageenan-induced edema in mice

Avocado peel extract reduce swelling at 10 g·kg-1 of extract

Hydrocarbons, St and UFA have anti-inflammatory properties

Alkhalf et al. (2019)

 

In vitro cell cultures

Hass and Fuerte

Peels and seeds AE and EE

-Lipopolysaccharides- stimulated macrophages

- TNF-α production and MTT

- NO by Griess reagent

Fuerte peel extract suppressed the release of TNF-α and NO

Phenolics from peels are anti-inflammatory

Tremocoldi et al. (2018)

Anti-inflammatory, hepatoprotective, antihypertensive

Mice model

-

Seeds EAE

Indomethacin-induced gastric ulcer in mice

Extract mitigates oxidative stress by reducing lipid peroxidation and increasing superoxide dismutase enzyme activity

Gastric ulcer can be prevented by seed extracts

Athaydes et al. (2019)

Anti-toxic and cardioprotective

Mice model: doxorubicin (DOX)-induced toxicity

Avocado

Seeds AE and EE

- DOX and DOX+ AE/EE- treated rats

DOX treatment increased markers of cardiac dysfunction, and avocado extracts mitigated it

-EE more effective than AE, as evidenced by biochemical markers.

Shamlan (2020)

Antitumor

In vitro cell cultures

-

Peels and seeds lipid extracts

HCT116 colon- and HePG2 liver-human cell line cultures. MTT test

Seed lipids inhibited hepatocellular and colon cancer cells growth

Seeds lipids have anti-cancer effects

Alkhalf et al. (2019)

 

In vitro cell cultures

Hass

Seed colored ME

LNCaP cells - MTT test, cell cycle analysis, apoptosis

-Extracts reduced in vitro cancer cells viability, downregulated the expression of cyclin D1 and E2, associated with G0/G1 phase cycle arrest, and nuclear translocation of nuclear factor 𝜅B

- Extracts induced apoptosis

Extracts can be used as

a functional food ingredient

Dabas et al. (2019)

Antitumor and antioxidant

In vitro free radical scavenging and anti-proliferative activities

-

Seed EE

RAW 264.7 cells - NO production, MTT cancer cell growth inhibition, DNA oxidative assay

-High IC50 for free radical scavenging fractions

- Seed extract protect against H2O2-induced DNA damage

- EE reduces NO production from lipopolysaccharide-stimulated cells

- Extracts inhibited the proliferation of cancer cells

Avocado seeds are a source of healthy compounds

Vo et al. (2019).

Antimicrobial

Antifungal -Cladosporium cladoposioides

Avocado

Inmature peels, searching antifungal fractions

-Antifungal activity by TLC bioassay

-Incubation of compounds with fungi

Trihydroxy fragments could be present in all

active compounds

Preventive effects against avocado anthracnose

Adikaram et al. (1992)

 

Antiprotozoal - Trypanosoma cruzi

Avocado

Seeds, EE, including six PFA

In vitro T. cruzi immobilization

PFA showed moderate activity against epimastigotes and trypornastigotes

PFA prevent T. cruzi disease, Chagas' disease

Abe et al. (2005)

 

Amoebicidal, Giardicidal Trichomonicidal

Antimycobacterial

Avocado

Seeds, CE and EE

In vitro cell cultures

- CE and EE activity against E. histolytica, G. lamblia and T. vaginalis (IC50 <0.634 μg·ml-1).

- CE inhibited M. tuberculosis reference

Extracts active against all tested microorganisms

Jiménez-Arellanes et al. (2013)

 

Antifungal -Candida spp., Cryptococcus neoformans, Malassezia pachydermatis

Avocado

Seeds HE and EE

Antifungal activity by microdilution in RPMI

Extracts active against all the yeast strains tested in vitro, with differing MIC

Candidates as antifungal agents

Leite et al. (2009)

 

Antibacterial and antifungal

Avocado

Seeds ME and EAE

Disc diffusion method

ME and EAE had the lowest MIC against C. albicans

EA and EAE had higher activity than treptomycin

Idris et al. (2009)

 

Antibacterial and antifungal

Hass’ and ‘Fuerte

Peel, pulp, and seed extracts

Disk diffusion method

-Gram-positive bacteria more sensitive than Gram-negative.

- Gram-positive Bacillus cereus and Listeria monocytogenes more sensitive

- E. coli was the most sensitive Gram-negative bacteria

Good antimicrobial properties

Rodríguez-Carpena et al. (2011)

 

Antibacterial

Avocado

Seeds: AE, ME and EE

Disk diffusion method

Seed extracts active against S. aureus and B. subtilis.

Seeds have highly antibacterial activity   

Nagaraj et al. (20 10)

 

Antibacterial

Fuerte, Hass, Shepard

Seeds and epicarp: AE and EE

Hole plate method

-Effect of ethanol extracts toward bacteria

-AE activity only for Listeria monocytogenes (93.8–375.0 μg·mL-1) and Staphylococcus epidermidis (354.2 μg·mL-1)

Antimicrobial against S. enteritidis, Citrobacter freudii, P. areuginosa, and Enterobacter aerogenes

Chia and Dykes (2010)

 

Table 4: Continued

 


 

Table 4: Continued

 

 

Clostridium sporogenes vegetative cells and active endospores

Hass

Seeds AcE

Disk diffusion method

-All extracts inhibited vegetative cells and active endospores

-MIC of molecules 7.8-15.6 μg·mL-1

-Bactericidal for enriched fraction at 19.5 μg·mL-1

Identified molecules inhibit Gram-positive spore-forming bacteria.

Rodríguez-Sánchez et al. (2013)

 

Antimicrobial and antioxidant

Hass

- Seed and peel AE

-Nisin, antimicrobial peptide

-Antimicrobial activity by turbidimetry

-Listeria innocua, E. coli, Lactobacillus sakei, Weissella viridescens, and Leuconostoc mesenteroides.

- Polyphenols from peel extracts have antioxidant and radical scavenging properties

- Peel and seed extracts and nisin have synergic antimicrobial properties

 

Avocado peel + nisin reduce the amount of nisin to achieve antioxidant and antimicrobial effects

Calderón-Oliver et al. (2016)

 

Antioxidant, antimicrobial

Hass

Seed and peels AE and EE

- MIC, MBC, and MFC

- Bactericidal effects in Gram positive and negative strains.

- Extracts from seeds displayed better MCB than peels

- Fungicidal effect in 2 strains for kernel extracts.

-High activity against some bacteria and fungi strains

Melgar et al. (2018)

Larvicidal

Artemia salina and third stage Aedes aegypti larvae

Avocado

Seeds HE and ME

-Toxicity tests using A. salina

-Larvicidal in A. agypti

Extracts active against larvae

Alternative dengue control agents

Leite et al. (2009)

Radioprotective

Sprague-Dawely

rats

Avocado

Peel extracts

Exposition to 6 MV X-Ray

Avocado peel extract induced a greater recovery of lymphocytes, red blood cells, and platelets to irradiate rats when compared to rats without peel extract administration. SOD was further increased

Avocado peel extract acts as a radiation protective agent for blood cells and major organs

Kim et al. (2020)

Toxic

Acute and sub-acute toxicity in rats

Avocado

Seeds, EAE extract

- IP administration of seed extract

- IP subacute toxicity for 14 d at 75 and 150 mg·kg-1 BW

-Acute toxicity study showed low LD50

- Liver and kidney had normal architecture after 14 d exposure

-14 d-treatment decreased food consumption, BW, and blood parameters

Seed EAE had medium toxicity

Taha et al. (2008)

 

Toxicity in rats

Avocado

Seeds, AE

- LD50 and mortality

- Sub-acute experiments, doses at a quarter of the maximum dose (10 mg·kg-1 BW)

 

- Hematological parameters and ALT, AST, albumin and creatinine not significantly altered.

The seed extract was safe on acute and sub-acute basis

Ozolua et al. (2009)

 

Oral acute toxicity in mice

Avocado

Seeds AE and ME

-Hypolipidemic test

- LD50 of seeds

-Antioxidant

-Oral Acute Toxicity

-100% mortality after 6 d in the group fed with 2500 mg seeds·kg-1 BW

-125 mg AS·kg-1 BW reduced the elevated levels of total cholesterol

AE and ME can be used for treating hyperlipidemia

Pahua-Ramos et al. (2012)

 

-Acute toxicity test in BALB/c mice

-Genotoxicity

Avocado

Seed EE

-LD50

-Genotoxicological study - Erythrocyte micronucleus test

 

-LD50 EE: 1200.75 mg·kg−1 BW

-EE at 250 mg·kg−1 BW inhibited micronucleus formation

- EE induces acute toxicity at 500 mg·kg−1

- EE lacks mutagenic effects on blood cells

Padilla-Camberos et al. (2013)

 

Wistar Albino Rats: -Hepatotoxicity

-Liver enzymatic activity

P. americana seeds

Seed phenolics AE and EE

AST, ALT, and

ALP activities

Hepatotoxic effect after oral administration of phenolic AE

- Liver damage

- AE is hepatotoxic

Umar et al. (2016)

Abbreviations. AE: aqueous extract; AcE: acetone extract; AST: Aspartate aminotransferase; ALT: Alanine aminotransferase; ALP: Alkaline phosphatase; BW: body weight; CE: chloroform extract; EAE: ethyl acetate extract; EE: ethanol extract; HE: hexane extract; IP: intraperitoneal; MBC minimum bactericidal concentrations, MFC: minimum fungicidal concentrations; ME: methanol extract; MIC: minimum inhibitory concentrations; PFA: polyhydroxylated fatty alcohols; RPMI: Roswell Park Memorial Institute; SOD: superoxide dismutase; St: sterols; UFA: unsaturated fatty acids

 

Antimicrobial

 

Information on this activity is summarized in Table 4, and selected data on MIC (mg·mL-1) and inhibition zone (mm) at 100 mg·mL-1 are displayed in Table 5. The most widely used method to check the antimicrobial activity of AP extracts was the agar disk technique, although the hole plate method and turbidimetry were also used. Jiménez-Arellanes et al. (2013) tested chloroform extract (CE) and EE of avocado seeds against Giardia lamblia, Entamoeba histolytica, and Trichomonas vaginalis, and amoebicidal, giardicidal, trichomonicidal, and antimycobacterial activities were found. The trypanocidal effects of ME of seeds against Trypanosoma cruzi were checked by Abe et al. (2005), and six hydroxylated fatty alcohols, i.e., acetogenins, were the bioactive compounds identified as responsible for such actions. These showed moderate activity against epimastigotes and trypomastigotes and thus can prevent T. cruzi disease, the etiological agent for Chagas' illness. Leite et al. (2009) checked the in vitro antifungal activity of avocado seeds against Cryptococcus neoformans, Candida spp., and Malassezia pachydermatis strains. The authors concluded that the extracts obtained from avocado seeds can be used as dengue control agents.

Several authors tested AP extracts against different pathogenic fungi: Adikaram et al. (1992) reported that dichloromethane extract of peels exercised antifungal activity against Cladosporium cladoposioides. Such activity Table 5: Selected antimicrobial activity of extracts of avocado by-products

 

Variety / extract

Bacillus cereus

Bacillus subtilis

Listeria monocytogenes

Staphylococcus aureus

Staphylococcus epidermidis

Streptococcus pyogenes

Escherichia coli

Klebsiella pneumoniae

Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Pseudomonas spp.

Salmonella typhimurium

Mycobacterium avium

Yarrowia lipolytica

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reference

MIC (mg·mL-1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Seed, ethyl acetate extract a

-

20

-

20

-

20

40

30

30

-

40

-

-

Idris et al. (2009)

Seeds, water extract

-

-

.09

-

0.35

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Chia and Dykes (2010)

Seeds, ethanol extract

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

0.1

-

Jiménez-Arellanes et al. (2013)

Seeds, chloroform extract

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

0.02

-

Jiménez-Arellanes et al. (2013)

Chloramphenicol

-

-

240

70

-

80

60

60

 

 

60

-

-

Sreedevi and Pradeep (2016)

Peel, ethanol:water, (80:20 v/v)

0.015

-

0.030

0.030

-

-

0.30

-

0.030

 

0.10

-

-

Melgar et al. (2018)

Seeds, ethanol:water, (80:20 v/v)

0.020

-

0.030

0.030

-

-

0.15

-

0.030

 

0.030

-

-

Melgar et al. (2018)

Streptomycin

0.10

-

0.20

0.04

-

-

0.20

-

0.20

 

0.25

-

-

Melgar et al. (2018)

Inhibition zone (mm) at 100 mg·mL-1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Seed, ethyl acetate extracta

-

32

-

37

-

35

16

27

22

-

16

-

-

Idris et al. (2009)

Seed, methyl alcohol-water

-

16.7-32.7

-

20.8-30.5

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

 

Nagaraj et al. (2010)

Peel / Hass

-

-

5.07

5.80

-

-

5.73

-

-

5.73

-

-

6.00

Rodríguez-Carpena et al. (2011)

Seed / Hass

9.20

-

9.27

8.33

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Rodríguez-Carpena et al. (2011)

Peel / Fuerte

6.33

-

5.80

5.33

-

-

-

-

-

5.73

-

-

5.53

Rodríguez-Carpena et al. (2011)

Seed / Fuerte

7.87

-

7.33

6.80

-

-

7.67

-

-

-

-

-

5.20

Rodríguez-Carpena et al. (2011)

Chloramphenicol

20.0

-

21.20

19.03

-

-

21.67

-

-

7.53

-

-

-

Rodríguez-Carpena et al. (2011)

Chloramphenicol

-

35.6

-

34.0

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Nagaraj et al. (2010)

a Extract displaying more potency among five different-polarity ones

 

was attributed to trihydroxy fragments, which later were identified as hydroxylated fatty alcohols. Idris et al. (2009) tested the activity of ethyl acetate extract (EAE), CE, and ME, which were compared favorably with the activity of the standard streptomycin, while ME and EAE had the lowest MIC value (10 mg·mL-1) against C. albicans.

Nagaraj et al. (2010) tested several seed extracts against some bacterial pathogens, such as Bacillus subtilis, which causes foodborne illness, and S. aureus, the causative agent of impetigo, cellulitis, and scalded skin syndrome, being such potential diseases for humans easily transmitted by food animals. Authors assayed AE, EA, ME, and CE against the two above indicated bacteria, and significant activity was found. Chia and Dykes (2010) tested the antimicrobial activity of EA and AA of epicarps and seeds of several avocado varieties. The EA showed antimicrobial activity (0.104–0.417 mg·mL-1) against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria (except for E. coli), while AE was only active against Listeria monocytogenes and Staphylococcus epidermidis. No inhibition by either EA and AA were observed against Aspergillus flavus and Penicillium spp. Rodríguez-Carpena et al. (2011) found highly antibacterial activity for AP against several pathogens and spoilage microorganisms commonly found in meat products. The authors found Gram-negative bacteria less sensitive than Gram-positive, as demonstrated by the measured inhibition zone (mm) at 100 mg·mL-1. Rodríguez-Sánchez et al. (2013) screened the AE of seeds, further fractionated, against active endospores and vegetative cells of Clostridium sporogenes. Authors performed bioassay-guided purification of crude extracts from seeds, based on inhibitory properties, and linked antimicrobial activity to six acetogenin compounds (Fig. 6, compounds 1–6). Both vegetative cells and active endospores were inhibited by the extracts, and the MIC of isolated molecules was found in the 7.8 to 15.6

 

Fig. 7: Chemical structures of carotenoids contained in avocado by-products

 

 

Fig. 8: Chemical structure of phytic acid identified in avocado by-products

 

μg·mL-1 range, while an enriched fraction at 19.5 μg·mL-1 showed bactericidal activity. The authors concluded that the isolated compounds should be used as natural alternatives to antibiotics and additives used by the food and pharmaceutical

 

Fig. 6: Chemical structures of acetogenins identified in avocado by-products. Active compounds 1−6 isolated from an avocado seed extract capable of inhibiting Clostridium sporogenes PA 3679 (ATCC 7955) vegetative cell growth and endospore germination. 1, (2S,4S)-1-acetoxy-2,4-dihydroxy-n-heptadeca-16-ene;2, persediene; 3, persenone-C; 4, persenone-A; 5, persenone-B; 6, persin (Rodríguez-Sánchez et al. 2013). Compounds 7-11 are anti-inflammatory, as described by Rosenblat et al. (2011)

industries to inhibit Gram-positive spore-forming bacteria.

Nisin (an antimicrobial peptide) was assayed in combination with AP extracts to improve the antimicrobial activity against some food-borne bacteria such as Listeria, as well as the antioxidant capacity (Calderón-Oliver et al. 2016). Both peel and seed extracts-containing mixtures showed antioxidant activity and radical scavenging capacity, which was attributed to their polyphenolic composition, and a synergic antimicrobial response was noted in the mixtures of both extracts in conjunction whit nisin. The highest antimicrobial and antioxidant activities were obtained for a mixture containing 61% of peel extract with 39% of nisin. Later, the encapsulation of a mixture of nisin and avocado peel extract by freeze and spray drying was optimized. Table 6: Selected antioxidant activities reported for avocado by-products

 

Variety

Organ

Antioxidant assays

 

ABTS radical

µmol

Trolox·g-1

CUPRAC

µmol Trolox·g-1

DPPH

IC50

μg·mL−1

DPPH

µmol

Trolox·g−1

FRAP

µmol

FeSO4 g−1

ORAC

µmol

Trolox·g−1

TEAC

μmol Trolox·g−1

Reference

Avocado

Seed FW

236

 

 

 

 

 

 

Soong and Barlow (2004)

Avocado

Seed DW

725

 

 

 

1484

 

 

Soong and Barlow (2004)

Avocado

Seed DW

1571-1888

 

 

 

27287-3078

 

 

Soong and Barlow (2004)

Avocado

Peel DW

 

 

3.83

 

 

 

 

Lee et al. (2008)

Avocado

Seed DW

 

 

7.78

 

 

 

 

Lee et al. (2008)

Several cultivars

Seed FW

 

 

 

38-190

 

58.2-631

 

Wang et al. (2010)

Several cultivars

Seed FW

 

 

 

128-240

 

229-464

 

Wang et al. (2010)

Hass

Peel DW

1457

 

 

 

1457

 

 

Tesfay et al. (2010)

Hass

Seed DW

2593

 

 

 

1331

 

 

Tesfay et al. (2010)

Fuerte

Peel FW

35-242

104-456

 

35-175

 

 

 

Rodríguez-Carpena et al. (2011)

Fuerte

Seed FW

38-195

96-353

 

28-167

 

 

 

Rodríguez-Carpena et al. (2011)

Hass

Peel FW

16-104

56-218

 

18-89

 

 

 

Rodríguez-Carpena et al. (2011)

Hass

Seed FW

22-158

58-275

 

18-66

 

 

 

Rodríguez-Carpena et al. (2011)

Avocado

Peel DW

23.8

 

 

 

 

 

34.72

Deng et al. (2012)

Avocado

Seed DW

17.5

 

 

 

 

 

42.63

Deng et al. (2012)

Hass

Peel DW

 

 

 

 

 

470.0

161.0

Kosińska et al. (2012)

Hass

Seed DW

 

 

 

 

 

210.0

94.0

Kosińska et al. (2012)

Shepard

Peel DW

 

 

 

 

 

290.0

112.0

Kosińska et al. (2012)

Shepard

Seed DW

 

 

 

 

 

350.0

91.0

Kosińska et al. (2012)

Avocado

Seed DW

173.3

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pahua-Ramos et al. (2012)

Hass

Peel DW

792

 

 

310

 

 

 

Daiuto et al. (2014)

Hass

Seed DW

646

 

 

411

 

 

 

Daiuto et al. (2014)

Avocado

Peel DW

 

 

370.22

 

27.82

 

 

Morais et al. (2015)

Avocado

Seed DW

 

 

46.47

 

23.71

 

 

Morais et al. (2015)

Avocado

Peel FW

 

 

 

16.10

9.56 a

 

 

Rotta et al. (2015)

Avocado

Peel DW

 

 

 

763.02

422.8 a

 

 

Rotta et al. (2015)

Hass

Peel DW

 

 

 

 

 

216.8

 

Calderón-Oliver et al. (2016)

Hass

Seed DW

 

 

 

 

 

1.6

 

Calderón-Oliver et al. (2016)

Hass

Peel DW

 

 

 

 

 

12.41-31.10

 

Saavedra et al. (2017)

Hass

Seed DW

 

 

 

 

 

8.26-11.01

 

Saavedra et al. (2017)

Fuerte

Peel DW

1004.5

 

 

420.5

1881.4

 

 

Tremocoldi et al. (2018)

Fuerte

Seed DW

580.8

 

 

464.9

931.7

 

 

Tremocoldi et al. (2018)

Hass

Peel, DW

791.5

 

 

310

1175.1

 

 

Tremocoldi et al. (2018)

Hass

Seed DW

645.8

 

 

410.7

656.9

 

 

Tremocoldi et al. (2018)

Nariño

Peel DW

 

 

138.2

 

 

 

5,700

Rosero et al. (2019)

Nariño

Seed DW

 

 

320.1

 

 

 

3,200

Rosero et al. (2019)

Hass, Hass type

Peel FW

 

 

 

 

 

 

6.99-103.12

Ramos-Aguilar et al. (2021)

Ascorbic acid

 

8138.86

3009.68

 

54189.92

 

 

 

Tusevski et al. (2014)

α-tocopherol

 

2685.04

2488.81

 

2221.83

 

 

 

Tusevski et al. (2014)

BHA

 

2476.47

6422.31

 

4317.85

 

 

 

Tusevski et al. (2014)

a expressed as Fe2SO4.7H2O

Abbreviations: ABTS: 2,2'-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid; CUPRAC: cupric reducing antioxidant capacity; DW: dry weight; DPPH: 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl; FW: fresh weight; FRAP: Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Power; ORAC: Oxygen Radical Absorbance Capacity; TEAC: trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity

 

The authors concluded that such microcapsules could be used as functional ingredients (Calderón-Oliver et al. 2017).

The antimicrobial activity measured as MIC and diameters of growth inhibition zones (mm) of AP extracts is compared with that of chloramphenicol in Table 5. Chia and Dykes (2010) and Jiménez-Arellanes et al. (2013) found extreme potency for all AP extracts. Idris et al. (2009), found higher activity developed by AP against some pathogenic bacteria than that showed by chloramphenicol, as demonstrated by MIC methodology. Concerning the activity evaluated by the diameter inhibition area methodology, Nagaraj et al. (2010) found growth inhibitory activity of avocado seed extracts against B. subtilis and S. aureus, which was similar to that exercised by chloramphenicol and approximately ~46 times higher than that found by other authors for S. aureus. Melgar et al. (2018) found a high capacity of EA of AP against several bacterial and fungal strains. MIC, Minimum Fungicidal Concentration (MFC), and Minimum Bactericidal Concentration (MBC) were checked for 4 Gram-positive, 4 Gram-negative bacteria, and

 

Fig. 9: Chemical structures of polyols identified in avocado by-products

 

 

Fig. 10: Chemical structures of sterols identified in avocado by-products

 

7 microfungi. The activity was found in 7 bacterial strains, and the seeds extracts showed better MBC than peel extracts in 6 out of 8 strains, while the fungicidal effect was exercised only by seeds extracts against some strains.

Differences in antimicrobial activities of AP found by different authors could be related to diverse extraction procedures of AP, bacterial strains assayed or can be due to the various methodologies used for testing bacterial inhibition. In any case, all results indicate high antibacterial activity for avocado peel and seed extracts.

Text Box:  

Fig. 11: Organic acids identified in avocado by-products

 

Fig. 12: Tocopherols identified in avocado by-products
Larvicidal activity

 

Leite et al. (2009) tested HE and EE of avocado seeds against Artemia salina and evaluated larvicidal activity against Aedes aegypti. They concluded that the extracts obtained from avocado seeds merit further research to be used against dengue.

Toxicity of avocado by-products

 

Several experiments were performed to determine the potential toxicity of avocado seeds, which was mainly attributed to perseitol occurrence. Acute and sub-acute toxicity in rats was determined by intraperitoneal (i.p.) administration of EAE of avocado seeds (Taha et al. 2008). At the end of a 14 d-trial, it was found that the liver and kidney showed normal architecture and that the treatment decreased food consumption, BW, and blood parameters, concluding that the EAE induced relatively low toxicity. Another experiment was performed on rats to assess the possible toxicity of the AE of seeds (Ozolua et al. 2009). The authors calculated LD50 and found that hematological parameters and the levels of albumin, creatinine, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), remained unchanged. Moreover, the seed extract was found to be safe on an acute and sub-acute basis. Pahua-Ramos et al. (2012) performed oral acute toxicity assays in mice-feed avocado seeds. They found hypolipidemic and antioxidant effects while feeding with 2.5 g of avocado seeds·kg-1 BW for 6 d induced a 100% of mortality; however, it was noted that125 mg of avocado seeds·kg-1 BW reduced the elevated levels of total cholesterol. Thus, it was concluded that both AS and ME or avocado seed flour can be used for treating hyperlipidemia. Padilla-Camberos et al. (2013) performed an acute toxicity test in male BALB/c mice, obtaining an LD50 for the seed extract of 1200.75 mg·kg-1. It was found that 250 mg·kg-1 of extract and the negative control induced a low amount of micronucleated cells; however, in vivo mutagenicity on peripheral blood cells after seed extract supplementation was not observed. Umar et al. (2016) assayed hepatotoxic effects of AE and PE of avocado seed on liver enzymatic activity. They found that a daily oral administration of both AE and PE of seeds during 3 weeks at 500 mg·kg-1 BW showed hepatotoxic effects. Such actions were also tested for liver enzymes by checking AST, ALT, and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activities. It was found that a daily oral administration of AE and PE of seeds for 3 weeks at 0.5 g·kg-1 induced minor liver damage.

As seen, most experimentation showed weak toxicological effects, which occur only at high doses of seed extracts. Moreover, all experiments were conducted using mice and rats, which can be useful to discern the possible toxicity of AP for humans; however, other animal models designed to evaluate possible toxicity for farm animals remain poorly developed. This deprives knowing the precise use of such by-products to feed farm animals and given the appropriate nutrient composition and phytochemical profiles of AP, further experimentation on this subject is necessary.

 

Antioxidant activity

 

Oxidative stress has been cited as responsible for early events conducting to the development of important infectious diseases in farm animals, such as pneumonia and enteritis. Given that oxidative stress should be easily prevented with antioxidants, the use of antioxidant-rich feeds could be a positive action in farm animals (Lykkesfeldt and Svendsen 2007).

This capacity is usually determined through in vitro studies. But Oboh (2013) tested several phenolic extracts of different avocado organs in rat’s pancreas through a Fe2+ induced lipid peroxidation test. All the extracts caused a significant decrease in malondialdehyde contents in the pancreas in a dose-dependent manner, and the seed had the highest inhibitory effect on Fe2+ induced lipid peroxidation (IC50 = 60.61 µg·mL-1). The authors concluded that the phenolic extracts of several AP were able for protecting the pancreas from in vitro lipid peroxidation. This action was attributed to phenolics, due to their reducing power, Fe2+ chelating, and radical scavenging abilities.

In vitro performed colorimetric and fluorometric antioxidant capacity tests are based on Hydrogen Atom Transfer (HAT) mechanism. Usually, HAT-based methods monitor competitive reaction kinetics. These methods generally used a synthetic-free radical generator, e.g., the 2,2′-azinobis (3-ethylbenzothiazolline-6-sulfonic acid (ABTS). Generally, the antioxidant capacity usually checks the ability of the antioxidants in controlling the degree of oxidation, and the antioxidant capacity tests can be based on the peroxyl radical scavenging, such as those based on the total radical trapping antioxidant parameter (TRAP); oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC); metal-reducing power such as ferric reducing/antioxidant power (FRAP); hydroxyl radical scavenging such as deoxyribose assay; organic radical scavenging such as ABTS, and 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH); and cupric reducing/antioxidant power (CUPRAC) (Karadag et al. 2009).

The results of the antioxidant activities of AP compared to ascorbic acid, α-tocopherol, and butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA) checked by various methodologies are displayed in Table 6. Notice that the results obtained for the antioxidant potential of the various extracts of seeds and peels for the same test are quite variable. This variability could be related to the use of by-products from different avocado varieties, and obtained from fruits in different maturation stages and cultivated following different agronomic protocols and under various climates. Good antioxidant activity was found in most of the extracts, albeit with many fluctuations, at about a tenth of that showed by checked pure molecules, i.e., ascorbic acid, α-tocopherol, and BHA. The antioxidant activity detected in both peels and seeds was found to be dependent on the type of test performed. For instance, Tesfay et al. (2010) found by the ABTS test higher antioxidant capacity for seeds than for peels; however, by the FRAP test the results were the opposite. On the other hand, an increase in the antioxidant capacity was detected in dried seeds and peels in comparison with fresh by-products. In this regard, Rotta et al. (2015) indicated an increase of up to 100 times this capacity for dried seeds, which is in good agreement with the findings of Soong and Barlow (2004), who reported that this phenomenon could be related to the production of Maillard-type antioxidants, although several other natural lipophilic antioxidants could have been degraded by drying. In addition, the surplus of the antioxidant activity might be related to the formation of polyphenols. As shown in Table 6, all tests indicate that both avocado peels and seeds have good antioxidant activities, which can be useful for increasing the health of farm animals.

 

Use of avocado by-products for feeding farm animals

 

Avocado has been cited as conditionally toxic for some animals, however ill effects of AP seem to be animal species-dependent, and healthy actions by feeding with AP have been found in some animals, such as pigs. The entire avocado fruits are commonly used as feed for pigs because of their high digestibility. However, it has been reported that the whole avocado fruit as pig feedstuff has lower nutritional value than the pulp and that the nutritive value of fruits varies according to cultivar. The seeds have higher nutritive value than peels, as evaluated in pigs by the mobile nylon bag technique (Carmenatti et al. 2015). The protein concentrations were found to be higher in pulps and peels than in the seeds of avocado varieties; however, the whole avocado fruit is easily digestible, and therefore fruit discards could be used for feeding pigs, although protein supplementation would be needed when AP constitute an important portion of pig diets (Ly et al. 2021). Overall, AP develop health actions in the muscles of pigs: it improves the FA composition, oxidation state and color stability of meat, and the composition of intramuscular fat. Also, the consumption of such by-products increases the degree of fat unsaturation, while the color of the muscles of pigs is better preserved from oxidation (Hernández-López et al. 2016). Positive results when feeding pigs with avocado peels were obtained also in rural Busia District, Kenya, by Mutua et al. (2012).

AP have been used successfully to feed ruminants. To this end, it has been proposed the avocado meal, which is an oil-extracted by-product from avocado fruits lacking commercial value, which contains high amounts of fiber. Given the high degradability of its dry matter, this AP has been proposed for ruminant diets (Skenjana et al. 2006). Generally, AP have been positively evaluated for feeding goats and sheep. For instance, it has been observed that a mix of avocado seeds and orange peels meal, in a 25:35 ratio, has the potential to positively replace guinea grass in the diet of West African Dwarf male growing sheep (Okoruwa et al. 2015). Moreover, a trial using avocado waste (a mixture of pulp and peels) included in multi-nutrient blocks for feeding goats was successfully conducted by Evan et al. (2020). These workers found an improvement in the quality of the FA profile of milk, while milk yield was unaffected. Authors reported that the intake of multi-nutrient blocks containing 14.8% AP was low, probably due to the oxidation and rancidity of avocado lipids. Interestingly, no changes were noted in milk production, however, feeding blocks with AP increased milk fat content with minor changes in the FA profile of fat milk.

In aquaculture, the use of AP is highly recommended. These can constitute an energy source in fish farms, which are highly dependent on local resources. This assumption was made mainly based on the contents of crude protein and fat, and also considering the effectiveness of removing anti-nutritional constituents (Kassahun et al. 2012). In this regard, the antioxidant properties of a tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) diet with the inclusion of AP were evaluated. An increasing pattern was observed for both the antioxidant activity and the total phenolic compounds content as the level of AP inclusion increased. Therefore, AP was considered a good fed ingredient in aquaculture diets because of their antioxidant properties and the added value granted by its use (Jiménez-Ruiz et al. 2019).

In birds, the results appear to be contradictory. In this way, it was investigated the effectiveness of avocado seed powder-based supplements on meat quality and the liver and kidney physiology of culled female quails (Coturnix coturnix japonica). The results of the experimentation showed that avocado seed powder-containing supplements significantly improved the level of serum glutamic pyruvate transaminase (GPT), creatinine, urea, fat, protein, cholesterol, meat tenderness, and cooking loss. Thus, avocado seed powder-containing supplements improved meat quality and the liver and kidney physiology of the culled female quail (Tugiyanti et al. 2019). Similarly, Akinduro et al. (2021), proposed the use of avocado seed powder in broiler chicken diets. Authors demonstrated that avocado seed powder can be used in broiler chickens for up to 5.5% of the total diet, and such inclusion led to an improved feed conversion ratio and carcass growth. However, Van Ryssen et al. (2013) warmed against the inclusion of AP in broilers’ diets This was evidenced by some trials in that such waste induced poor performance of the birds, although no symptoms of toxicity were observed at the end of the experiments.

Despite the positive effects referenced, avocado fruits have been associated with congestive heart failure related to severe cardiomyopathy in goats, sheep, horses, and ostriches (Stadler et al. 1991). Low doses develop aseptic mastitis in horses and goats, while high intake of the fruits of some avocado cultivars has poisoned budgerigars, birds, cats, mice, rats, horses, rabbits, cattle and goats, and canaries, among others, and possibly dogs (Kellerman et al. 2005). Persin has been cited as responsible for the toxicity of avocado peels and seeds, being considered a fungicidal toxin found in the leaves and fruits of the avocado tree. The lethal dose is characteristic of each animal species. The mechanism by which avocado compounds act is by triggering fluid accumulation in the lungs, leading to difficulty breathing, and death takes place due to oxygen deprivation. Fluid accumulation can also occur in the pancreas, heart, and abdomen (Buoro et al. 1994).

To use AP as livestock feed, the excessive amount of bioactive compounds in AP could be decreased by hydrothermal treatment. This was successfully applied to avocado seeds to reduce bioactive compounds and fiber contents to safe levels, and different boiling times were investigated. Results showed a significant reduction in the fiber fractions and bioactive compounds as the boiling time increased when compared with the raw seeds, and iron was significantly higher in the treated samples than in the raw ones. Moreover, the energy values showed a slight increase from the raw at 30 min of hydrothermal treatment (Ibhaze 2017). Although persin was not analyzed in this work, this bioactive would probably follow the same trend as the other bioactive compounds.

The experimentation developed to feed PA to farm animals shows highly contradictory results. Probably, the toxicity or beneficial effects of PA in farm animals are due to the different levels of persin in the various PA, whose concentration is dependent on the type of avocado cultivar considered. Therefore, pending new research, it is advisable to use PA in mixtures with other by-products or, alternatively, to carry out hydrothermal treatments to reduce bioactive compounds included in PA to safe levels, according to the experimentation shown.

 

Conclusions

 

As exposed in this work, avocado waste, i.e., peels and seeds, contain suitable amounts of several health-enhancing compounds for farm animals. Avocado peels contain a great variety of phenolic acids and flavonol glycosides, while the seeds contain mainly flavanol monomers, procyanidins, and hydroxycinnamic acids. Other highly relevant phytochemicals found in avocado by-products are acetogenins, which have antimicrobial, antibacterial, and spore germination inhibiting effects, and whose occurrence is restricted to Annonaceae and Lauraceae. The utilization of avocado by-products to feed farm animals could become an important tool for adequate by-products management to ensure ecologically and sustainable production. Comprehensive experiments in farm animals are needed, including not only the use of pure phytochemicals but also feeding animals with raw by-products to ensure cheap exploitation and sustainability of the production processes. Also, rigorously toxicological experiments clarifying the possible toxic effects of avocado by-products cited in some farm animals are needed, while studies on nutritional aspects of avocado by-products such as the aminoacyl composition of the various seeds and peels varieties, will help to discern the nutritional potential of these by-products. Furthermore, the reduction of bioactive compounds contained in avocado by-products through different treatments, such as hydrothermal ones, should be enhanced. Not only in terms of the composition of the resulting product, but also in terms of the health of farm animals fed with such by-products.

 

Acknowledgements

 

The author acknowledge the financial support of Vicerrectorado de Investigación e Innovación of University of Almería (Project 2020/00001014), Junta de Andalucia (Proyect P20_00806), Campus de Excelencia Internacional Agroalimentario (ceiA3), and Centro de Investigación en Agrosistemas Intensivos Mediterráneos y biotecnología Agroalimentaria (CIAMBITAL).

 

Author Contributions

 

JLGG conducted the study, performed the literature search, the data extraction and wrote all parts of this paper.

 

Conflicts of Interest

 

The author declare no conflict of interest of any sort.

 

Data Availability

 

I hereby declare that the data relevant to this paper is available and will be provided on request.

 

Ethics Approval

 

This study does not involve human subjects. Thus, ethics approval is not required.

 

References

 

Abe F, S Nagafuji, M Okawa, J Kinjo, H Akahane, T Ogura, MA Martinez-Alfaro, R Reyes-Chilpa (2005). Trypanocidal constituents in plants 5. Evaluation of some Mexican plants for their trypanocidal activity and active constituents in the seeds of Persea americana. Biol Pharm Bull 28:13141317

Adikaram NKB, DF Ewing, AM Karunaratne, EMK Wijeratne (1992). Antifungal compounds from immature avocado fruit peel. Phytochemistry 31:9396

Akinduro VO, EK Asaniyan, VF Adekunle (2021). Growth, carcass and organ of broiler chickens fed finisher diets with avocado pear (Persea americana) seed powder. Uniosun J Agric Renew Res 4:113

Alkhalf MI, WS Alansari, EA Ibrahim, ME ELhalwagy (2019). Anti-oxidant, anti-inflammatory and anti-cancer activities of avocado (Persea americana) fruit and seed extract. J King Saud Univ Sci 31:13581362

Araújo RG, RM Rodriguez-Jasso, HA Ruiz, MME Pintado, CN Aguilar (2018). Avocado by-products: Nutritional and functional properties. Trends Food Sci Technol 80:5160

Ashton OB, M Wong, TK McGhie, R Vather, Y Wang, C Requejo-Jackman, P Ramankutty, AB Woolf (2006). Pigments in avocado tissue and oil. J Agric Food Chem 54:1015110158

Athaydes BR, GM Alves, ALEMD Assis, JVD Gomes, RP Rodrigues, BP Campagnaro, BV Nogueira, D Silveira, RM Kuster, TMC Pereira, RR Kitagawa (2019). Avocado seeds (Persea americana Mill.) prevents indomethacin-induced gastric ulcer in mice. Food Res Intl 119:751760

Bressani R, B Rodas, AS Ruiz (2009). La composición química, capacidad antioxidativa y valor nutritivo de la semilla de variedades de aguacate, Fondo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología-FONACYT, Universidad del Valle de Guatemala-UVG, Tegucigalpa, Guatemala

Buoro IBJ, SB Nyamwange, D Chai, SM Munyua (1994). Putative avocado toxicity in two dogs. Onderstepoort J Vet Res 61:107109

Calderón-Oliver M, HB Escalona-Buendía, ON Medina-Campos, J Pedraza-Chaverri, R Pedroza-Islas, E Ponce-Alquicira (2016). Optimization of the antioxidant and antimicrobial response of the combined effect of nisin and avocado byproducts. LWT-Food Sci Technol 65:4652

Carmenatti JL, J Bugarin, ML Alonso-Spilbury, JG Rodríguez-Carpena, V Orozco, CL Flores (2015). Use of the mobile nylon bag technique for measuring in situ digestibility of some supplies food and avocado in pigs. Trop Subtrop Agroecosyst18:221229

Cid-Pérez TS, PO Hernández-Carranza, CE Velasco, II Ruiz-López, GV Nevárez-Moorillón, R Ávila-Sosa (2021). Avocado seeds (Persea americana cv. Criollo spp.): Lipophilic compounds profile and biological activities. Saud J Biol Sci 28:3384–3390

Cueva C, MV Moreno-Arribas, PJ Martín-Álvarez, G Bills, MF Vicente, A Basilio, CL Rivas, T Requena, JM Rodríguez, B Bartolomé (2010). Antimicrobial activity of phenolic acids against commensal, probiotic and pathogenic bacteria. Res Microbiol 161:372–382

Dabas D, RJ Elias, GR Ziegler, JD Lambert (2019). In vitro antioxidant and cancer inhibitory activity of a colored avocado seed extract. Intl J Food Sci 2019:1–7

Daiuto ÉR, MA Tremocoldi, SMD Alencar, RL Vieites, PH Minarelli (2014). Chemical composition and antioxidant activity of the pulp, peel and by products of avocado'Hass. Rev Bras Fruticult 36:417424

Deng GF, C Shen, XR Xu, RD Kuang, YJ Guo, LS Zeng, LL Gao, X Lin, JF Xie, EQ Xia, S Li (2012). Potential of fruit wastes as natural resources of bioactive compounds. Intl J Mol Sci 13:83088323

Ding H, YW Chin, AD Kinghorn, SM D’Ambrosio (2007). Chemopreventive characteristics of avocado fruit. In: Seminars Cancer Biology, Vol. 17, pp:386394. Academic Press, London

Dixon RA, DY Xie, SB Sharma (2005). Proanthocyanidins — a final frontier in flavonoid research? New Phytol 165:9–28

Domínguez MP, K Araus, P Bonert, F Sánchez, GS Miguel, M Toledo (2014). The Avocado and its waste. An approach of fuel potential/application. In: Environment, Energy and Climate Change Vol. 2, pp:199–223. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland

Evan TD, MD Carro, JEF Yepes, A Haro, L Arbesú, M Romero-Huelva, E Molina-Alcaide (2020). Effects of feeding multinutrient blocks including avocado pulp and peels to dairy goats on feed intake and milk yield and composition. Animals 10:194–205

FAO (2019). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Statistical Division, 2019. http://faostat3.fao.org/download/Q/QC/E/ (Accessed 05 March 2021)

Figueroa JG, I Borrás-Linares, J Lozano-Sánchez, A Segura-Carretero (2018). Comprehensive identification of bioactive compounds of avocado peel by liquid chromatography coupled to ultra-high-definition accurate-mass Q-TOF. Food Chem 245:707716

Guil-Guerrero, JL, L Ramos, C Moreno, JC Zúñiga-Paredes, M Carlosama-Yepez, P Ruales (2016a). Plant-food by-products to improve farm-animal health. Anim Feed Sci Technol 220:121135

Guil-Guerrero JL, L Ramos, C Moreno, JC Zúñiga-Paredes, M Carlosama-Yepez, P Ruales (2016b). Antimicrobial activity of plant-food by-products: A review focusing on the tropics. Livest Sci 189:3249

Guil-Guerrero JL, L Ramos, C Moreno, JC Zúñiga-Paredes, M Carlosama-Yepez, P Ruales (2016c). Plant foods by-products as sources of health-promoting agents for animal production: A review focusing on the tropics. Agron J 108:17591774

Guri AJ, R Hontecillas, H Si, D Liu, J Bassaganya-Riera (2007). Dietary abscisic acid ameliorates glucose tolerance and obesity-related inflammation in db/db mice fed high-fat diets. Clin Nutr 26:107–116

Hagerman AE, KM Riedl, GA Jones, KN Sovik, NT Ritchard, PW Hartzfeld, TL Riechel (1998). High molecular weight plant polyphenolics (tannins) as biological antioxidants. J Agric Food Chem 46:1887–1892

Heinonen M (2007). Antioxidant activity and antimicrobial effect of berry phenolics — a Finnish perspective. Mol Nutr Food Res 51:684–691

Hernández-Brenes C, MI García-Cruz, JA Gutiérrez-Uribe, JA Benavides-Lozano, DG Rodríguez-Sánchez (2013). Antimicrobial, antibacterial and spore germination inhibiting activity from an avocado extract enriched in bioactive compounds. U.S. Patent Application No. 13/763,262

Hernández-López SH, JG Rodríguez-Carpena, C Lemus-Flores, F Grageola-Nuñez, M Estévez (2016). Avocado waste for finishing pigs: Impact on muscle composition and oxidative stability during chilled storage. Meat Sci 116:186–192

Ibhaze GA (2017). Influence of hydrothermal treatment duration on the nutritional quality of avocado pear (Persia americana) seed meal for livestock feeding. Anim Res Intl 14:2759–2763

Idris S, G Ndukwe, C Gimba (2009). Preliminary phytochemical screening and antimicrobial activity of seed extracts of Persea americana (avocado pear). Bayero J Pure Appl Sci 2:173–176

Imafidon KE, FC Amaechina (2010). Effects of aqueous seed extract of Persea americana Mill. (avocado) on blood pressure and lipid profile in hypertensive rats. Adv Biol Res 4:116–121

Jeong WS, ANT Kong (2004). Biological properties of monomeric and polymeric catechins: Green tea catechins and procyanidins. Pharm Biol 42:8493

Jiménez-Arellanes A, J Luna-Herrera, R Ruiz-Nicolás, J Cornejo-Garrido, A Tapia, L Yépez-Mulia (2013). Antiprotozoal and antimycobacterial activities of Persea americana seeds. BMC Compl Altern Med 13:109–113

Jiménez-Ruiz EI, JG Rodríguez-Carpena, GP Hernández-Ortega, MT Sumaya-Martínez, R Balois-Morales, LM Sánchez-Herrera, VP Peraza-Gómez (2019). Antioxidant properties of a tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) diet with the inclusion of avocado by-product. Biotecnia 21:163–169

Karadag A, B Ozcelik, S Saner (2009). Review of methods to determine antioxidant capacities. Food Anal Meth 2:41–60

Kashman Y, I Néeman, A Lifshit (1969a). New compounds from avocado pear. Tetrahedron 25:4617–4631

Kashman Y, I Néeman, A Lifshitz (1969b). Six new c17olefinic and acetylenic oxygenated compounds from avocado pear. Israel J Chem 7:173–176

Kassahun A, H Waidbacher, W Zollitsch (2012). Proximate composition of selected potential feedstuffs for small-scale aquaculture in Ethiopia. Livest Res Rur Dev 24:1–118

Kellerman TS, JAW Coetzer, TW Naude, CJ Botha (2005). Plant Poisonings and Mycotoxicosis of Livestock in Southern Africa. Oxford University Press Southern Africa, Cape Town, South Africa

Kim SM, CW Rico, SC Lee, MY Kang (2010). Modulatory effect of rice bran and phy tic acid on glucose metabolism in high fat-fed C57BL/6N mice. J Clin Biochem Nutr 47:12–17

Kim JO, JH Shin, DY Jung, CH Jeon, JE Lee, YJ Lee, BI Min (2020). Evaluating the radioprotective effect of avocado peel extracts upon rat exposed to 6 MV x-ray. J Kor Soc Radiol 14:553–561

Klopfenstein TJ, R Angel, G Cromwell, GE Erickson, DG Fox, C Parsons, LD Satter, AL Sutton, DH Baker, A Lewis, D Meyer (2002). Animal diet modification to decrease the potential for nitrogen and phosphorus pollution. Counc Agric Sci Technol 21:175–188

Kosińska A, M Karamać, I Estrella, T Hernández, B Bartolomé, GA Dykes (2012). Phenolic compound profiles and antioxidant capacity of Persea americana Mill. peels and seeds of two varieties. J Agric Food Chem 60:4613–4619

Kumar R, S Vaithiyanathan (1990). Occurrence, nutritional significance and effect on animal productivity of tannins in tree leaves. Anim Feed Sci Technol 30:21–38

Lee SG, MH Yu, SP Lee, IS Lee (2008). Antioxidant activities and induction of apoptosis by methanol extracts from avocado. J Kor Soc Food Sci Nutr 37:269–275

Leite JJG, ÉHS Brito, RA Cordeiro, RSN Brilhante, JJC Sidrim, LM Bertini, SMD Morais, MFG Rocha (2009). Chemical composition, toxicity and larvicidal and antifungal activities of Persea americana (avocado) seed extracts. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 42:110113

Ly J, P Fránquez, G Rodríguez, C Lemus, IA Domínguez, F Grageola (2021). Note on in vitro digestion of avocado products for pigs. S Afr J Anim Sci 51:138141

Lykkesfeldt J, O Svendsen (2007). Oxidants and antioxidants in disease: oxidative stress in farm animals. Vet J 173:502511

Melgar B, MI Dias, A Ciric, M Sokovic, EM Garcia-Castello, AD Rodriguez-Lopez, L Barros, IC Ferreira (2018). Bioactive characterization of Persea americana Mill. by-products: A rich source of inherent antioxidants. Indust Crops Prod 111:212–218

Morais DR, EM Rotta, SC Sargi, EM Schmidt, EG Bonafe, MN Eberlin, AC Sawaya, JV Visentainer (2015). Antioxidant activity, phenolics and UPLC–ESI (–)–MS of extracts from different tropical fruits parts and processed peels. Food Res Intl 77:392–399

Msika P, J Legrand, S Garnier (2013). Use of avocado skin for obtaining an avocado unsaponifiable material enriched with saturated aliphatic hydrocarbons and with sterols. US Patent Application No. 14/370,892

Mutua FK, C Dewey, S Arimi, W Ogara, M Levy, E Schelling (2012). A description of local pig feeding systems in village smallholder farms of Western Kenya. Trop Anim Health Prod 44:1157–1162

Nagaraj M, V Sandhya, G Supriya, R Manju, K Pranitha, B Shivaji, V Lalitha, B Kiran (2010). Antioxidant and antibacterial activity of avocado (Persea gratissima Gaertner.) seed extract. World Appl Sci J 9:695–698

Negesse T, HPS Makkar, K Becker (2009). Nutritive value of some non-conventional feed resources of Ethiopia determined by chemical analyses and an In vitro gas method. Anim Feed Sci Technol 154:204–217

Oboh G (2013). Inhibitory effect of phenolic extract from leaf and fruit of avocado pear (Persea americana) on Fe2+ induced lipid peroxidation in rats’pancreas in vitro. Futa J Res Sci 2:276–286

Okoruwa MI, ETE Ehebha, E Omoragbon (2015). Replacement value of avocado seeds with orange peels meal for guinea grass on growth performance and nutrient digestibility of growing sheep. Intl J Res 2:35–40

Ozolua R, O Anaka, S Okpo, S Idogun (2009). Acute and sub-acute toxicological assessment of the aqueous seed extract of Persea americana Mill (Lauraceae) in rats. Afr J Trad Compl Altern Med 6:573578

Padilla-Camberos E, M Martínez-Velázquez, JM Flores-Fernández, S Villanueva-Rodríguez (2013). Acute toxicity and genotoxic activity of avocado seed extract (Persea americana Mill., cv Hass). Sci World J 2013:1–4

Pahua-Ramos ME, A Ortiz-Moreno, G Chamorro-Cevallos, MD Hernández-Navarro, L Garduño-Siciliano, H Necoechea-Mondragón, M Hernández-Ortega (2012). Hypolipidemic effect of avocado (Persea americana Mill) seed in a hypercholesterolemic mouse model. Plant Foods Hum Nutr 67:10–16

Pallauf J, G Rimbach (1997). Nutritional significance of phytic acid and phytase. Arch Anim Nutr 50:301–319

Pechinskii SV, AG Kuregyan (2014). The Impact of Carotenoids on Immunity (Review). Pharm Chem J 47:509–513

Piccirilli A, N Piccardi, P Msika, F Paul, S Bredif (2015). Use of a compound comprising D-mannoheptulose and/or perseitol for treating and preventing innate immunity modification diseases. U.S. Patent No. 9,023,810. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Washington DC, USA

Puiggros F, N Llopiz, A Ardevol, C Blade, L Arola, MJ Salvado (2005). Grape seed procyanidins prevent oxidative injury by modulating the expression of antioxidant enzyme systems. J Agric Food Chem 53:6080–6086

Ramos MDR, G Jerz, S Villanueva, F López-Dellamary, R Waibel, P Winterhalter (2004). Two glucosylated abscisic acid derivates from avocado seeds (Persea americana Mill. Lauraceae cv. Hass). Phytochemistry 65:955962

Ramos-Aguilar AL, J Ornelas-Paz, LM Tapia-Vargas, AA Gardea-Béjar, EM Yahia, JD Jesús Ornelas-Paz, S Ruiz-Cruz, C Rios-Velasco, P Escalante-Minakata (2021). Effect of cultivar on the content of selected phytochemicals in avocado peels. Food Res Intl 140:110024

Raymond Chia TW, GA Dykes (2010). Antimicrobial activity of crude epicarp and seed extracts from mature avocado fruit (Persea americana) of three cultivars. Pharm Biol 48:753756

Rodas BD, CM Luhman, BL Miller, PA Porter (2015). Method and composition for improving the health of young monogastric mammals. U.S. Patent No. 9,078,457. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Washington DC, USA

Rodríguez-Carpena JG, D Morcuende, MJ Andrade, P Kylli, M Estévez (2011). Avocado (Persea americana Mill.) phenolics, in vitro antioxidant and antimicrobial activities, and inhibition of lipid and protein oxidation in porcine patties. J Agric Food Chem 59:5625–5635

Rodríguez-Sánchez DG, A Pacheco, MI García-Cruz, JA Gutiérrez-Uribe, JA Benavides-Lozano, C Hernández-Brenes (2013). Isolation and structure elucidation of avocado seed (Persea americana) lipid derivatives that inhibit Clostridium sporogenes endospore germination. J Agric Food Chem 61:7403–7411

Rodríguez-Saona C, JT Trumble (2000). Biologically active aliphatic acetogenins from specialized idioblast oil cells. Curr Org Chem 4:1249–1260

Rosenblat GS, Meretski, J Segal, M Tarshis, A Schroeder, A Zanin-Zhorov, G Lion, A Ingber, M Hochberg (2011). Polyhydroxylated fatty alcohols derived from avocado suppress inflammatory response and provide non-sunscreen protection against UV-induced damage in skin cells. Arch Dermat Res 303:239–246

Rosero JC, S Cruz, C Osorio, N Hurtado (2019). Analysis of phenolic composition of byproducts (Seeds and Peels) of avocado (Persea americana Mill.) cultivated in Colombia. Molécula 24:3209–3225

Rotta EM, DR De Morais, PBF Biondo, VJ Dos Santos, M Matsushita, JV Visentainer (2015). Use of avocado peel (Persea americana) in tea formulation: A functional product containing phenolic compounds with antioxidant activity. Acta Sci Technol 38:23–29

Ryssen JBJV, A Skenjana, WAV NIekerk (2013). Can avocado meal replace maize meal in broiler diets? Appl Anim Husb Rur Dev 6:22–27

Saavedra J, A Córdova, R Navarro, P Díaz-Calderón, C Fuentealba, C Astudillo-Castro, L Toledo, J Enrione, L Galvez (2017). Industrial avocado waste: Functional compounds preservation by convective drying process. J Food Eng 198:81–90

Saavedra MJ, A Borges, C Dias, A Aires, RN Bennett, ES Rosa, M Simões (2010). Antimicrobial activity of phenolics and glucosinolate hydrolysis products and their synergy with streptomycin against pathogenic bacteria. Med Chem 6:174–183

Schaffer BA, BN Wolstenholme (2013). The Avocado: Botany, Production and Uses. Whiley AW CABI Publishing, New York, USA

Shamlan G (2020). Ethanolic and aqueous extracts of avocado (Persea americana) seeds attenuates doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity in male albino rats. Arab J Sci Eng 46:5265–5274

Skenderidis P, S Leontopoulos, K Petrotos, I Giavasis (2021). Vacuum microwave-assisted aqueous extraction of polyphenolic compounds from avocado (Persea Americana) solid waste. Sustainability 13:2166–2182

Skenjana A, JBJV Niekerk, WAV Ryssen (2006). In vitro digestibility and in situ degradability of avocado meal and macadamia waste products in sheep. S Afr J Anim Sci 36:78–81

Soong YY, PJ Barlow (2004). Antioxidant activity and phenolic content of selected fruit seeds. Food Chem 88:411–417

Sreedevi R, BV Pradeep (2016). Anthelmintic and antibacterial activity of red pigment from Aspergillus terreus. Res J Pharm Biol Chem Sci 72:249–257

Stadler P, IBJV Rensburg, T Naude (1991). Suspected avocado (Persea americana): Poisoning in goats. J S Afr Vet Assoc 62:186–188

Storey WB, B Bergh, GA Zentmyer (1986). The origin, indigenous range and dissemination of the avocado. Calif Avocado Soc Yearbook 70:127–133

Taha NA, AAM Alkhawajah, KK Raveesha (2008). Acute and subacute toxicity studies of Persea americana Mill (Avocado) seed in rats. Intl J Med Toxicol Legal Med 11:31–36

Takenaga F, K Matsuyama, S Abe, Y Torii, S Itoh (2008). Lipid and fatty acid composition of mesocarp and seed of avocado fruits harvested at northern range in Japan. J Oleo Sci 57:591–597

Talabi JY, OA Osukoya, OO Ajayi, GO Adegoke (2016). Nutritional and antinutritional compositions of processed Avocado (Persea americana Mill) seeds. Asian J Plant Sci Res 6:6–12

Tesfay SZ, I Bertling, JP Bower (2010). Anti-oxidant levels in various tissues during the maturation of ‘Hass’ avocado (Persea americana Mill.). J Hortic Sci Biotechnol 8:106112

Torres AM, T Mau-Lastovicka, R Rezaaiyan (1987). Total phenolics and high-performance liquid chromatography of phenolic acids of avocado. J Agric Food Chem 3:921925

Tremocoldi MA, PL Rosalen, M Franchin, AP Massarioli, C Denny, ÉR Daiuto, JAR Paschoal, PS Melo, SMD Alencar (2018). Exploration of avocado by-products as natural sources of bioactive compounds. PLoS One 13:1–12

Tugiyanti E, N Iriyanti, YS Apriyanto (2019). The effect of avocado seed powder (Persea americana Mill.) on the liver and kidney functions and meat quality of culled female quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica). Vet World 12:1608–1615

Tusevski O, A Kostovska, A Iloska, L Trajkovska, SG Simic (2014). Phenolic production and antioxidant properties of some Macedonian medicinal plants. Centr Eur J Biol 9:888–900

Uchenna UE, AB Shori, AS Baba (2017). Inclusion of avocado (Persea americana) seeds in the diet to improve carbohydrate and lipid metabolism in rats. Rev Argent Endocrinol Metabol 54:140148


Umar AZ, UA Umar, SM Dambazau, A Sulaiman (2016). Comparative hepatotoxic effects of aqueous and phenolic extracts of avocado (Persea americana) seed in wistar albino rats. Intl J Biochem Res Rev 10:1–6

Vo TS, PU Le, DH Ngo (2019). Free radical scavenging and anti-proliferative activities of avocado (Persea americana Mill.) seed extract. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed 9:91

Wang W, TR Bostic, L Gu (2010). Antioxidant capacities, procyanidins and pigments in avocados of different strains and cultivars. Food Chem 122:1193–1198

Wen AP, Delaquis, K Stanich, P Toivonen (2003). Antilisterial activity of selected phenolic acids. Food Microbiol 20:305–311