Biological Activity
of Avocado By-Products: A Review Focusing on Farm Animals’ Health
José
Luis Guil-Guerrero
Food Technology
Division, Agrifood Campus of International
Excellence, ceiA3, University of Almería, E-04071, Almería, Spain
Corresponding author: jlguil@ual.es; ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2666-17
Received
18 February 2022; Accepted 30 April 2022; Published 26 May 2022
Abstract
The avocado
industries produce a large amount of waste, which constitutes a threat to the environment. In this work, the
complete set of bioactive compounds from avocado by-products (AP), their
biological activities, and the experimentation accomplished using AP in farm
animals’ diets are reviewed. AP, that is seeds and peels, are raw sources of
phenolic compounds (flavanol monomers, procyanidins, and hydroxycinnamic
acids), furan derivatives, aliphatic acetogenins (which have antimicrobial and
spore germination inhibiting effects), carotenoids, phytates, polyols, and
sterols. Moreover, AP contain valuable nutrients (proteins, lipids, and
carbohydrates) that could effectively contribute to farm animals’ diets. Among
the biological properties of AP, highlight their antimicrobial, antioxidant,
and anti-inflammatory ones. Ill effects of avocado by-products seem to be
animal species-dependent, given that AP has been cited as conditionally toxic
for some animals. Conversely, feeding AP has positive effects on pigs, and
these have been used successfully to feed goats and sheep, and in aquaculture.
To use AP as livestock feed, the excessive amount of bioactive compounds could
be decreased by hydrothermal treatment. This was successfully applied to
avocado seeds to reduce bioactive compounds and fiber contents to safe levels.
Overall, AP could be used for extracting healthy compounds to be used as nutritional
supplements, and for improving the health of selected farm animals.
Furthermore, AP-derived compounds could be useful in reducing the emergence of
antibiotic-resistant bacteria, which has been linked to the abusive use of
antibiotics when used as growth promoters in farm animals' production. © 2022 Friends Science Publishers
Keywords: Avocado by-products; Phenolics; Furans;
Acetogenins; Antioxidant; Farm animals
Introduction
Avocado
(Persea Americana Mill.) is the most
important crop within the Laurel family (Lauraceae). This tropical tree produces an oily fruit used by
indigenous people for at least 9,000 years and obtained in the wild in
Meso-America, which was appreciated by Mayan and Aztec civilizations (Storey et
al. 1986). Today, this fruit is quickly distributed in all regions of the world
due to its favorable nutrient properties: it contains a large amount of
monounsaturated
fatty acids (FA) and valuable quantities of vitamins, minerals, and
phytochemicals (Schaffer and Wolstenholme 2013). The fruits of avocado are
mainly used for human consumption and to produce cosmetics, nutritional
supplements, and livestock feed. The avocado pulp is generally used for
culinary purposes, while the seeds and peels are usually disposed of by
landfilling. In 2019, the world avocado production was 7,308,978 Tm (FAO, 2019),
and from this production, the avocado by-products (AP) accounted for ~54.8%
(wet basis) (Negesse et al. 2009). Historically, avocado seeds have been
used in traditional Mesoamerican medicine for the treatment of rheumatism, asthma, various infectious
diseases, and also for diarrhea and dysentery induced by intestinal parasites
(Jiménez-Arellanes et al. 2013).
The
criteria for designing feed formulas are based on improving body weight (BW),
feed conversion efficiency, protein accretion, and milk and egg production.
Regrettably, all criteria focus on productivity rather than on achieving
healthy animals, and for this antibiotics are used (Guil-Guerrero et al.
2016a). This use is intended to avoid gastrointestinal infections and
inflammatory bowel diseases. However, antibiotics are often misused in animal
production farms, and thus antibiotic residues appear in the environment
(Guil-Guerrero et al. 2016b). For avoiding this excessive use,
plant-food by-products can be introduced into the diet of farm-animal, as these
contain suitable concentrations of plant-derived compounds with antimicrobial
and health-enhancing properties (Guil-Guerrero et al. 2016c).
A
major problem with AP used as food or feed supplements is that although they
contain protein and carbohydrates, the high concentration of polyphenols
contained in it confers a bitter taste and can reach toxicity at high levels
(Domínguez et al. 2014). However, their use in mixes with other plant
food by-products or feed will reduce such flavor to acceptable limits, while
providing interesting amounts of bioactive compounds for health promotion.
Previously,
AP were partially reviewed about phenolic compounds content, and some
biological activities, such as antioxidant ones (Araújo et al. 2018).
However, despite the wide research carried out on the biochemical
composition and biological activities of AP, as well as the studies on its use
as animal feed, still, all this research remains un-reviewed as a whole. The
present review discusses all relevant data about AP, focusing on their
biochemical composition and related health benefits for farm animals, while
potential directions for future studies are provided.
Biochemical
composition and health benefits of avocado by-products
Approximately,
100 g of fresh fruits generate 12‒16 g of peel and 14‒24
g of seeds (Bressani et al. 2009); thus, finding new uses for this
by-product is a desirable action. Considering the seeds, it highlights their
protein content, which is highly dependent on processing methodology, ranging
from 6.24 to 23.54 g·100 g-1 (Talabi et al. 2016). The seeds also
contain healthy fatty acids (FA), and the FA profiles of three avocado
varieties (Fuerte, Bacon, and Hass) were studied in Japan by Takenaga et al.
(2008). The main FA in seeds were linoleic acid (LA, 18:2n-6) (35.3‒38.2%
of total FA), oleic acid (OA, 18:1n-9) (22.4‒22.1% of total FA), and palmitic
acid (PA, 16:0) (17.7‒17.9%
of total FA). These FA percentages are similar to those reported by Alkhalf et
al. (2019).
Phytochemical
studies on AP identified various classes of natural products: phenolic compounds,
phytosterols, polyols, furan derivatives, acetogenins, carotenoids, abscisic
acid, lignans, glucosides, as well as FA and hydroxylated ones. The levels of
such compounds vary according to avocado variety, farming variables, and
ripeness. Measured levels are also influenced by the method of extraction
during experimentation.
Phenolics occur both in peels and seeds of
avocado fruits and comprise phenolic acids (Fig. 1), phenolic alcohol
derivatives (Fig. 2), flavonoids (Fig. 3), and procyanidins (oligomeric
tannins, Fig. 4). Total phenolic amounts deeply differ between avocado peels and
seeds (Table 1). Considering total phenolics reported as gallic acid equivalent
(GAE), in avocado peels these ranged from 1.40–18.94 g·kg-1 FW
(Ramos-Aguilar et al. 2021) to 527.8 g GAE·kg-1 DW (Rosero et
al. 2019), while total phenolics in seeds ranged from 0.30 g GAE·kg-1
g DW in cv. Criollo spp. (Cid-Pérez et al. 2021) to 292 g GAE·kg-1
DW in avocado seeds (Pahua-Ramos et al. 2012). In AP, flavonoids showed
low figures, but tannins occur in amounts similar to those of phenolic acids
(Lee et al. 2008), and anthocyanins showed variable amounts in peels
(Ashton et al. 2006).
Phenolic
profiles are summarized in Table 2. The peels extracts contain a great variety
of phenolic acids, such as hydroxycinnamic and hydroxybenzoic ones, and some
flavonoids such as quercetin and catechin. The seed extracts contain mainly
hydroxycinnamic acids, and flavonoids such as epicatechin catechin, and
procyanidins. Summarized phenolic acids show interesting properties for human
health and achieving a more sustainable and cleaner animal production. Simple phenolic acids have antibacterial actions,
for instance against Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas
aeruginosa, and Listeria
monocytogenes. Saavedra et al. (2010) described synergy between
streptomycin and phenolic acids against Gram-bacteria. Wen et al. (2003)
indicated that phenolic acids mixtures have additive antilisterial effects, and
reported a significant relationship between pH and antilisterial activity.
Cueva et al. (2010) stated that phenolic acids act as growth inhibitors
of several lactobacilli species and some pathogens (S. aureus and
Candida albicans), but P. aeruginosa was not affected by these
compounds. Flavonoids are secondary polyphenolic metabolites that have a ketone
group and yellowish pigments, and the ones contained in AP have antibacterial
activity. Such compounds have been successfully tested against
oxacillin-resistant S. aureus,
cariogenic Streptococcus mutans, and uropathogenic E. coli. The
mechanisms related to the bacterial growth
inhibition were diverse, e.g.,
destabilization of the cytoplasmic membranes and the deprivation of the
substrates required for microbial growth, such as Fe and Zn (via chelation of molecules with these metals),
and such depletion can severely limit bacterial growth (Dixon et al. 2005; Heinonen 2007). Other interesting phenolics are
procyanidins, which are catechin- and epicatechin-oligomeric compounds, which
exhibit chemoprotective properties against cancer (Jeong and Kong 2004),
improve lipid metabolism (Puiggros et al. 2005), prevent infections in
the urinary tract, and can modulate antioxidant enzymatic activities (Puiggros et
al. 2005), among other bioactivities.
Tannins, i.e.,
water-soluble polyphenols, occur in avocado peel (Table 1, Negesse et al.
2009). These compounds, which have high molecular weight and many phenolic
groups, are able to precipitate protein (Hagerman et al. 1998). Tannins
affect rumen bacteria by inactivating several enzymes, e.g., glutamate dehydrogenase, proteases, and carboxymethyl
cellulase. Furthermore, sulfur and iron bioavailability is limited to animals
that consume tannin-rich tissues, thus, large consumption of tannins can induce
toxicity (Kumar and Vaithiyanathan 1990). The phenolic compounds contained in
AP are of great interest considering that these have high diversity, and
therefore a synergistic antibacterial action due to such compounds can be
expected through the consumption of AP, which could help to prevent many
digestive pathologies in farm animals.
Fig. 1: Phenolic acids contained in avocado by-products
Fig. 2: Phenolic alcohol derivatives contained in avocado
by-products
The occurrence of other compounds in AP is summarized in
Table 3. Furan derivatives (Fig. 5) were found in seeds by Ding et
al. (2007). These compounds have been subjected to structural
modifications, and antibacterial, antifungal, and insecticidal activities were
checked with positive results (Rodríguez-Saona and Trumble 2000). Aliphatic acetogenins, also known as “hydroxylated fatty
alcohols”, were reported by Kashman et al. 1969a, b, which constitute a
class of compounds almost exclusively isolated from avocado (Fig. 6). These
have antimicrobial, antibacterial and spore germination inhibiting effects
(Hernández-Brenes et al. 2013), and anti-inflammatory properties were
cited for the acetogenins isolated from avocado seeds (Fig. 6, compounds 7‒11)
(Rosenblat et al. 2011). Carotenoids were found in peels of Hass
variety by Ashton et al. (2006). These comprise β-carotene, neoxanthin, violaxanthin, zeaxanthin,
and α- and β-carotene
(Fig. 7). These compounds have a great interest in animal health since
carotenoids influence both cellular and humoral immunity, thus these can be
used to prevent infectious and inflammatory processes. Furthermore, recent
investigations on the role of carotenoids in angiogenesis, apoptosis, and gene
regulation, revealed mechanisms of immune system regulation (Pechinskii and
Kuregyan 2014). Polyols (ascorbic acid, mannoheptulose,
and perseitol, among others), were reported by Tesfay
et al. (2010) in avocado peels and seeds (Figs. 8, 9), and the latter
was also found in Hass avocado peels by Figueroa et al. (2018). The
consumption of such compounds has health effects on young monogastric mammals,
which exhibited an increased survival rate, both over the intermediate portions
of the pre-weaning period and over the entire pre-weaning period (Rodas et al. 2015). Avocado-derived compounds
containing polyols, comprising D-mannoheptulose
and/or perseitol, have been proposed for treating and
preventing innate immunity modification diseases by increasing the production
of antimicrobial peptides (e.g.,
Human β-defensin-2), without inducing inflammatory reactions, irritation,
or intolerance (Piccirilli et al. 2015). Sterols (Fig. 10) occur
mainly in the unsaponifiable obtained from the avocado peel, which contains
0.2% of saturated aliphatic hydrocarbons and more than 1% of sterols (Msika et
al. 2013). This unsaponifiable includes stigmasterol, ß-sitosterol, campesterol,
Δ5-avenasterol, Δ7-stigmasterol, and
citrostadienol. Alkhalf et al. (2019) reported
in avocado seeds cholesterol, stigmasterol, and β-sitosterol. Sterols-rich by-products could have interest
in improving animal health since such compounds positively
affect the wellness and health of farm animals through a variety
of physiological
Fig. 3: Flavonoids contained
in avocado by-products
Fig. 4: Procyanidins
contained in avocado by-products
functions,
e.g., antitumor
effects, hormone-like actions, oxidation and inflammation resistance, immune
modulation, and in vivo growth regulation (Guil-Guerrero et al.
2016a). Avocado seeds contain a lipid fraction in which occurs some FA as LA,
OA, and PA, which store energy, while LA is an essential nutrient and OA is a
bioactive compound (Takenaga et al. 2008). Besides these, other organic
acids are present in avocado by-products, which are depicted in Fig. 11.
Hass avocado peels contain quinic, citric, malic, and succinic acids (Figueroa et
al. 2018), while two glycosylated abscisic acid derivates were isolated
from seeds (Ramos et al. 2004). These molecules have been assayed in
abscisic acid-fed mice and typified as healthy, since they decrease blood
glucose concentrations in fasting, ameliorate glucose tolerance, adipocyte
hypertrophy, tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) expression, and macrophage infiltration, which were
significantly improved (Guri et al. 2007). Therefore, such molecules
could have positive health effects on farm animals, although the extent of this
effect remains unknown. In addition to all the
above-detailed compounds, Figueroa et al. (2018) found in avocado peels a
lignan (nudiposide) and
Table 1: Total phenolics, anthocyanin, and flavonoids in
avocado by-products
Variety |
Seed |
Peel |
Reference |
Total phenolics |
|||
Hass, Gwen, Fuerte |
16.5-29.8 g GAE·kg-1 g FW |
- |
Torres et al. (1987) |
- |
88.2 g GAE·kg-1 DW |
- |
Soong and Barlow (2004) |
Several cultivars |
19.2-51.6 g GAE.kg-1 FW |
4.3-113.9 g GAE·kg-1 FW |
Wang et al. (2010) |
Hass |
17.0–60.8 g GAE·kg-1 g DW |
32.9–90.0 g GAE·kg-1 g DW |
Rodríguez-Carpena et
al. (2011) |
Fuerte |
20.3–69.1 g GAE·kg-1 DW |
40.5–172.2 g GAE kg--1 DW |
Rodríguez-Carpena et
al. (2011) |
- |
7.20 g GAE·kg-1 g FW |
8.39 g GAE kg-1 g FW |
Deng et al. (2012) |
Hass |
9.51 g
CE·kg-1 DW |
25.32g CE·kg-1 DW |
Kosińska et al. (2012) |
Shepard |
13.04 g
CE·kg-1 DW |
15.61 g·CE·kg-1 DW |
Kosińska et al. (2012) |
- |
292 g GAE·kg-1 DW |
- |
Pahua-Ramos et al. (2012) |
- |
29.37 g GAE·kg-1
g DW |
30.01 g GAE·kg-1
g DW |
Oboh (2013) |
Hass |
57.3 g·GAE·kg-1 g DW |
63.5 g·GAE kg-1 g DW |
Daiuto et al. (2014) |
- |
1.553 g GAE·kg-1 g DW |
12.523 g·GAE kg-1 g DW |
Morais et al. (2015) |
Hass |
5.7 g GAE·kg-1 g DW |
19.7 GAE·kg-1 g DW |
Calderón-Oliver et al. (2016) |
Hass |
72.5 g·kg-1 |
227 g·kg-1 |
Melgar et al. (2018) |
- |
12.52-33.23 g GAE·kg-1 DW |
12.42-31.10 g GAE·kg-1 DW |
Saavedra et al. (2017) |
Hass |
57.3 g GAE·kg-1 DW |
63.5 g GAE·kg-1 DW |
Tremocoldi et al.
(2018) |
Fuerte |
59.2 g GAE·kg-1DW |
120.3 g GAE·kg-1 DW |
Tremocoldi et al.
(2018) |
328.8 g
GAE·kg-1 DW |
527.8 g
GAE·kg-1 DW |
Rosero et al. (2019) |
|
cv. Criollo sp. |
0.30g GAE·kg-1 g DW |
- |
Cid-Pérez et al. (2021) |
Pinkerton |
124 GAE·kg-1 FW·min-1 |
352 GAE·kg-1 FW·min-1 |
Skenderidis et al. (2021) |
- |
1.40–18.94
g GAE·kg-1 FW |
Ramos-Aguilar et al.
(2021) |
|
Hass |
2 mg·kg-1 DW |
2-9 mg·kg-1 DW |
Tesfay et al. (2010) |
Total flavonoids |
|||
- |
5.69 mg TE·kg-1 |
13.60 mg TE·kg-1 |
Lee et al. (2008) |
- |
2.32 g QE·kg-1
g DW |
3.39 g QE·kg-1
g DW |
Oboh (2013) |
Hass |
2.8 g QE·kg-1 DW |
10.9 g QE·kg-1 DW |
Calderón-Oliver et al. (2016) |
Total tannins |
|||
- |
137.2 mg TE·kg-1
FW |
223.45 mg TE·kg-1 FW |
Lee et al. (2008) |
- |
- |
49 g TE·kg-1 DW Non tannin 10; tanin 39 Condensed tannin 22.1 |
Negesse et al.
(2009) |
Hass |
0.09 g GAE·kg-1g DW |
0.04 g GAE·kg-1g DW |
Calderón-Oliver et al. (2016) |
Total anthocyanins |
|||
Hass |
- |
0-230 g·kg-1 FW, as cyanidin
3-O-glucoside |
Ashton et al. (2006) |
Abbreviations: CE: catechin
equivalent; DW: dry weight; FW: fresh weight; GAE: gallic acid equivalent; QE:
quercetin equivalent; TE: tannic acid equivalent
Fig. 5: Furans contained in avocado by-products
Table 2: Phenolic compounds occurrence in avocado
by-products
Seeds |
Peels |
Reference |
|
Several cultivars |
Procyanidins: 23.7-55.6 kg-1 FW |
Procyanidins 4.9-38.9 g GAE·kg-1
FW |
Wang et al. (2010) |
Has |
Procyanidins >
hydroxycinnamic acids > catechins > hydroxybenzoic acids |
procyanidins>
hydroxycinnamic acids> catechins |
Rodríguez-Carpena
et al. (2011) |
Fuerte |
Procyanidins >
hydroxycinnamic acids > catechins |
Procyanidins > catechins
> hydroxycinnamic acids > hydroxybenzoic acids |
Rodríguez-Carpena
et al. (2011) |
- |
Epicatechin 219.2, gallic acid
52.0 mg·kg-1 DW |
Catechin 520.8, chlorogenic
acid 116.8, homogentisic acid 113.6, cyanidin 3-glucoside 31.6 mg·kg-1
DW |
Deng et al. (2012) |
Has |
Catechin/epicatechin
gallate 152.8, procyanidin trimer A (II) 89.3, procyanidin trimer A (I) 81.7
mg·kg-1 DW |
Catechin 148.8, procyanidin
dimer B (I) 135.4, chlorogenic acid 81.8, quercetin-3-O-arabinosyl-glucoside
80.4 mg·kg-1 DW |
Kosińska et al. (2012) |
Shepard |
Catechin/epicatechin
gallate 105.4, procyanidin trimer A (I) 98.9, procyanidin trimer
A (II) 73, 3-O-caffeoylquinic acid 53.5 mg CE·kg-1 DW |
Quercetin 3-O-galactoside 144.1, quercetin derivative (III) 81.9, quercetin-3-O-arabinoside
94.1, quercetin derivative (I) 63.7 mg CE·kg-1 DW |
Kosińska et al. (2012) |
- |
Protocatechuic 128.1,
kaempferide 107.42, rutin 9.63, vainillic
acid 28.67, syringic acid 2.51, kaempferol 2.19, chlorogenic acid 0.516 mg·kg-1
DW |
- |
Pahua-Ramos et al. (2012) |
- |
- |
Catechin hydrate 1.71 mg·kg −1 DW Epicatechin 1.298 mg·kg −1 DW |
Morais et al. (2015) |
Hass |
3-O-Caffeoylquinic acid 19 mg, B-type (epi)catechin 12 mg,
epicatechin 46.5 mg·kg-1 extract |
4- and 5-O-Caffeoylquinic acid
40.9, epicatechin 46.5, catechin 20, B-type (epi)catechin 96, quercetin 7
mg·kg-1 extract |
Melgar et al. (2018) |
|
Catechin 242.6, chlorogenic acid 160.7, caffeic acid
136.9, ferulic acid 0.87 mg·kg-1 DW |
Chlorogenic acid 1376, p-Coumaric acid 17.4, ferulic acid 50.5 mg·kg-1 DW |
Saavedra et
al. (2017) |
Hass |
- |
Hydroxybenzoic
acids: benzoic, p-hydroxybenzoic protocatechuic, gentisic
acids. Hydroxycinnamic
acids: caffeic acid, caffeoylquinic acids derivatives, p-coumaric
acid. Flavanoids: naringenin, luteolin 7-O-(2″-O-pentosyl)
hexoside, quercetin, quercetin glucosides,
kaempferol glucosides, cinchonain I. Procyanidin dimers, trimers
and tetramers. Lignans: nudiposide. |
Figueroa et
al. (2018) |
Hass |
Trans-5-O-caffeoyl-D-quinic acid 1.63 mg·kg-1; Procyanidin B1 1.52 mg·kg-1; catechin 3.64 μg·mg-1; epicatechin 10.27 mg·kg-1 DW |
Procyanidin B2 48.38
μg·mg-1, epicatechin 40.21 mg·kg-1 DW |
Tremocoldi et al. (2018) |
Fuerte |
Trans-5-O-caffeoyl-D-quinicacid
5.74 mg·kg-1; procyanidin B1 2.27 mg·kg-1; catechin 8.13 mg·kg-1; epicatechin 11.06
mg·kg-1 DW |
Procyanidin
B2 28.34 mg·kg-1; epicatechin 30.40 mg·kg-1
DW |
Tremocoldi et al. (2018) |
Nariño |
Flavonols, catechins, hydroxycinnamic
acids, quercetin glycosides and procyanidins, phloridzin |
Flavonols, catechins, hydroxycinnamic
acids, quercetin glycosides, procyanidins, phloridzin |
Rosero et al. (2019) |
Hass and “Hass type” |
|
Chlorogenic
acid (0.13-0.91), procyanidin B2 (0.29-5.86), Epicatechin (0.24-2.17),
cyanidin 3-O-glucoside (0.09-0.83) g·kg-1 FW |
Ramos-Aguilar
et al. (2021) |
Abbreviations: DW: dry weight; FW: fresh weight; GAE: gallic acid
equivalent; RE: rutin equivalent; TE: tannic acid
equivalent; QE: quercetin equivalent |
two
glucosides: the iridoid-type penstemide, and (1′S,
6′R)-8′-hydroxyabscisic acid β-d-glucoside,
as well as hydroxylated FA. Phytates were described in avocado peels by
Negesse et al. (2009). Phytic acid (Fig. 12), is the main storage form
of phosphorus (P) in several plant tissues, especially bran and seeds, where it
is found as phytate, including Mg, Ca, Na, and K. As phytate form, P is not
available to humans and non-ruminant animals because they lack the digestive
enzyme phytase, which releases phosphate from the inositol in the phytate
molecule. This situation is different from that of ruminants, which can digest
phytate with the aid of the phytase that several microorganisms produced in the
rumen (Klopfenstein et al. 2002). Phytate can form complexes with
protein, which are pH-dependent. Such complexes reduce the bioavailability of
several mineral elements (Pallauf and Rimbach 1997). However, phytic acid can induce positive
actions, for instance through the prevention of the formation of free radicals
and by the reduction of the risk of high-fat diet-induced hyperglycemia via
regulation of hepatic glucose enzyme activities (Kim et al. 2010).
Phytic acid also decreases plasma triglycerides and cholesterol and induces a
change in the carryover of heavy metals (Pallauf and Rimbach 1997).
All the reviewed compounds develop antibacterial,
anti-inflammatory, and immunity-promoting actions, so the intake of PA would
contribute to improving the health of the digestive tract of farm animals.
Biological
activity of avocado by-products
Information
on this topic is summarized in Table 4, the selected antimicrobial activity of
avocado by-products extracts is detailed in Table 5, while information related
to antioxidant properties is described in Table 6.
Antidiabetic,
anti-inflammatory, antihepatotoxic, anti-toxic, and antihypertensive
These
assays were accomplished through in vitro cell cultures and mice models.
Uchenna et al. (2017), using a murine model demonstrated the
effectiveness of raw avocado seeds against hyperglycemia and/or
hypercholesteremia, while the seed extracts were characterized as
antihypertensive and antihepatotoxic in Wistar rats by Imafidon
and Amaechina (2010). Protection against UVB-induced
damage and inflammation of the skin was reported by Rosenblat et al.
(2011), who in vitro supplied polyhydroxylated fatty alcohols to
keratinocytes from avocado seeds prior to UVB exposure. These compounds were
able to reduce increasing cell viability and enhance DNA repair while
decreasing the secretion of PGE2 and IL-6, thus PFA can act as photoprotective
agents. Good anti-inflammatory activities of peel and seeds were reported for
Hass and Fuerte varieties by Tremocoldi et al. (2018), and the main
finding was that phenolic compounds-rich peel extracts were able to suppress
the release of TNF-α and NO. Moreover,
gastric ulcer can be prevented by seed extracts. Alkhalf
et al. (2019) found that avocado peel extract was appropriate to reduce
edema in mice at 10 g·kg-1 BW, while the prevention of gastric
ulcers due to oxidative stress was reported by Athaydes et al. (2019),
who indicated a reduction of lipid peroxidation and an increasing of superoxide
dismutase (SOD) enzyme activity. Anti-toxic and cardioprotective effects of the
AE and EE of avocado seeds against doxorubicin (DOX)-induced toxicity were
checked in a mice model by Shamlan (2020). Interestingly, avocado extracts
mitigated the increased markers of cardiac dysfunction induced by DOX
treatment.
Table 3: Other compounds occurring in avocado by-products
Variety |
Seed |
Peel |
Reference |
- |
Abcisic acid |
- |
Ramos et al. (2004) |
Hass |
- |
Carotenoids: total: 18-50; lutein: 10-21; β-carotene: 5-12; neoxanthin: 2-5
g·kg-1 FW. Others: anteraxanthin, violaxanthin, zeaxanthin, α-carotene. Total chlorophylls: 100-210 g·kg-1 FW |
Ashton et al. (2006) |
- |
Alkanols, terpenoids, glycosides, furan ring
derivatives, and a coumarin. |
- |
Ding et al. (2007) |
- |
Glycolipids, phospholipids |
- |
Takenaga et al. (2008) |
Hass |
Ascorbic acid: 12.6-22.7 Mannoheptulose: 5.34-7.95 Perseitol: 0.43-1.62 g·kg-1 DW |
- |
Tesfay et al. (2010) |
- |
- |
Phytathe 9 mg TE·kg-1 DW |
Negesse et al.
(2009) |
Avocado, several cultivars |
Total carotenoids 0.7-6.3 mg kg-1 FW |
Total carotenoids 9.3-17.7 mg kg-1 FW |
Wang et al. (2010) |
Ettinger |
Hydroxylated fatty alcohols, including persin |
- |
Rosenblat et al.
(2011) |
Hass |
Hydroxylated fatty alcohols |
|
Rodríguez-Sánchez et al. (2013) |
- |
1% sterols of unsaponifiable wt Sterols: ß-sitosterol, campesterol, stigmasterol, Δ5-avenasterol,
Δ7-stigmasterol, citrostadienol |
- - |
Msika et al. (2013) |
Hass |
- |
Organic acids: citric, malic, quinic,
succinic. Polyols: perseitol. Glucosides:
Iridoid-type: penstemide; and (1′S,
6′R)-8′-hydroxyabscisic acid β-d-glucoside. Hydroxylated
fatty acids |
Figueroa et al. (2018) |
- |
Fatty acids: mainly, linoleic, oleic and palmitic
acids. Hydrocarbons:
C18-C30, squalene. Sterols: cholesterol, stigmasterol and
β-sitosterol. |
- |
|
Criollo sp. |
Isoprenoids derivates, esters of fatty acids and their
derivatives |
|
Cid-Pérez et al. (2021) |
Hass and Hass type cv. |
|
Polyols, including perseitol
and volemitol Organic acids: succinic, citric, malic, quinic, fumaric, oxalic. Sterols: β-sitosterol,
stigmasterol, campesterol, cycloartenol; α- and δ-tocopherols Fatty acids: mainly oleic, linoleic, palmitic α- and δ-tocopherols; chlorophylls and
pheophorbides; carotenoids (lutein and others) |
Ramos-Aguilar et al. (2021) |
Antitumor
These
experiments were carried out using both peels and seeds. All trials were
accomplished using cancer cell lines cultures, and cell growth inhibition by
the MTT test was the more frequent antitumor assay. Alkhalf
et al. (2019) found inhibition of the growth of hepatocellular and colon
cancer cells by the lipid extracts of avocado peels. Dabas
et al. (2019) checked methanol extracts (ME) for in vitro antitumor
tests using several human cell lines, and a reduction in the viability of cells
was found due to that ME downregulate the expression of cyclin D1
and E2, and the nuclear translocation of nuclear factor 𝜅B.
Vo et al. (2019) found that the EE of
seeds inhibited cancer cells growth and provided protection against H2O2-induced
DNA damage and that AVM acts against NO production from cells. All these works
concluded that avocado seeds constitute a raw source of healthy compounds and
that these extracts can be used as ingredients for functional foods
formulations.
Table 4: Biological activity of avocado
by-products
Activity |
Model |
Variety |
Extracted
material |
Test |
Results |
Concluding
remarks |
Reference |
Sprague Dawley rats Spontaneous hypertensive rats |
- |
Raw
seeds |
Feeding
avocado seeds |
Avocado seeds lowered blood glucose and cholesterol and enhance liver
glycogen storage |
Possible uses of avocado seeds against hyperglycemia and/or
hypercholesteremia. |
Uchenna
et al. (2017) |
|
Antihepatotoxic |
Wistar rats |
Fuerte |
Seeds AE |
NaCl-treated
rats |
-AE reduce weight gain and
blood pressure - AE reduces alkaline
phosphatase activity |
AE are antihypertensive and
antihepatotoxic |
Imafidon and Amaechina (2010) |
In
vitro cell cultures |
- |
Seeds
PFA |
In
vitro keratinocytes cultures |
Decreased IL-6 and cyclobutane pyrimidine
dimers after UV-B radiation |
PFA reduce UV-B-induced inflammation in skin |
Rosenblat
et al. (2011) |
|
Mice
model |
- |
Peels and seeds lipid extracts |
Carrageenan-induced edema in mice |
Avocado peel extract reduce swelling at 10 g·kg-1 of
extract |
Hydrocarbons, St and UFA have anti-inflammatory properties |
Alkhalf
et al. (2019) |
|
|
In
vitro cell cultures |
Hass
and Fuerte |
Peels and seeds AE and EE |
-Lipopolysaccharides- stimulated macrophages - TNF-α
production and MTT -
NO by Griess reagent |
Fuerte peel extract suppressed the release of TNF-α and
NO |
Phenolics from peels are anti-inflammatory |
Tremocoldi
et al. (2018) |
Mice
model |
- |
Seeds
EAE |
Indomethacin-induced gastric ulcer in mice |
Extract mitigates oxidative stress by reducing lipid peroxidation and
increasing superoxide dismutase enzyme activity |
Gastric ulcer can be prevented by seed extracts |
Athaydes
et al. (2019) |
|
Anti-toxic and cardioprotective |
Mice model: doxorubicin
(DOX)-induced toxicity |
Avocado |
Seeds AE
and EE |
- DOX and DOX+ AE/EE- treated
rats |
DOX treatment increased
markers of cardiac dysfunction, and avocado extracts mitigated it |
-EE more effective than AE, as
evidenced by biochemical markers. |
Shamlan (2020) |
In vitro cell cultures |
- |
Peels and seeds lipid extracts |
HCT116 colon- and HePG2
liver-human cell line cultures. MTT
test |
Seed lipids inhibited
hepatocellular and colon cancer cells growth |
Seeds lipids have anti-cancer
effects |
Alkhalf et al. (2019) |
|
|
In
vitro cell cultures |
Hass |
Seed
colored ME |
LNCaP cells - MTT test, cell cycle analysis, apoptosis |
-Extracts reduced in vitro cancer cells viability, downregulated the expression of cyclin D1 and
E2, associated with G0/G1 phase cycle
arrest, and nuclear translocation of nuclear factor 𝜅B -
Extracts induced apoptosis |
Extracts can be used as a functional food ingredient |
Dabas
et al. (2019) |
In vitro free radical scavenging and
anti-proliferative activities |
- |
RAW 264.7 cells - NO production, MTT cancer
cell growth inhibition, DNA oxidative assay |
-High IC50 for free radical scavenging fractions - Seed extract protect against H2O2-induced DNA damage
- EE reduces NO production from lipopolysaccharide-stimulated cells - Extracts inhibited the proliferation of cancer cells |
Avocado seeds are a source of healthy compounds |
Vo
et al. (2019). |
||
Antimicrobial |
Antifungal -Cladosporium cladoposioides |
Avocado |
Inmature peels, searching antifungal fractions |
-Antifungal activity by TLC bioassay -Incubation of compounds with
fungi |
Trihydroxy fragments could be present in all active compounds |
Preventive effects against avocado anthracnose |
Adikaram et al.
(1992) |
|
Antiprotozoal - Trypanosoma cruzi |
Avocado |
Seeds, EE, including six PFA |
In vitro
T. cruzi immobilization |
PFA showed moderate activity against epimastigotes and trypornastigotes |
PFA prevent T. cruzi
disease, Chagas' disease |
Abe et al. (2005) |
|
Amoebicidal, Giardicidal Trichomonicidal Antimycobacterial |
Avocado |
Seeds, CE and EE |
In vitro cell cultures |
- CE and EE activity against E. histolytica, G.
lamblia and T. vaginalis (IC50 <0.634 μg·ml-1). - CE inhibited M. tuberculosis reference |
Extracts active against all tested microorganisms |
Jiménez-Arellanes et al. (2013) |
|
Antifungal -Candida spp., Cryptococcus neoformans,
Malassezia pachydermatis |
Avocado |
Seeds HE and EE |
Antifungal activity by microdilution in RPMI |
Extracts active against all the yeast strains tested
in vitro, with differing MIC |
Candidates as antifungal agents |
Leite et al. (2009) |
|
Antibacterial and antifungal |
Avocado |
Seeds ME and EAE |
Disc diffusion method |
ME and EAE had the lowest MIC against C. albicans |
EA and EAE had higher activity than treptomycin |
Idris et al. (2009) |
|
Antibacterial and antifungal |
Hass’ and ‘Fuerte’ |
Peel, pulp, and seed extracts |
Disk diffusion method |
-Gram-positive bacteria more sensitive than
Gram-negative. - Gram-positive Bacillus cereus and
Listeria monocytogenes more sensitive - E. coli was the most sensitive
Gram-negative bacteria |
Good antimicrobial properties |
Rodríguez-Carpena et al. (2011) |
|
Antibacterial |
Avocado |
Seeds: AE, ME and EE |
Disk diffusion method |
Seed extracts active against S. aureus and B. subtilis. |
Seeds have highly antibacterial activity |
Nagaraj et al. (20 10) |
|
Antibacterial |
Fuerte, Hass, Shepard |
Seeds and epicarp: AE and EE |
Hole plate method |
-Effect of ethanol extracts toward bacteria -AE activity only for Listeria monocytogenes
(93.8–375.0 μg·mL-1) and Staphylococcus epidermidis (354.2 μg·mL-1) |
Antimicrobial against S. enteritidis, Citrobacter freudii, P. areuginosa,
and Enterobacter aerogenes |
Chia and Dykes (2010) |
Table 4: Continued
Table 4: Continued
|
Clostridium sporogenes vegetative cells and active endospores |
Hass |
Seeds AcE |
Disk diffusion method |
-All extracts inhibited vegetative cells and active endospores -MIC of molecules 7.8-15.6 μg·mL-1 -Bactericidal for enriched fraction at 19.5 μg·mL-1 |
Identified molecules inhibit Gram-positive
spore-forming bacteria. |
Rodríguez-Sánchez et al. (2013) |
|
Antimicrobial
and antioxidant |
Hass |
- Seed and peel AE -Nisin, antimicrobial peptide |
-Antimicrobial activity by turbidimetry -Listeria innocua, E. coli, Lactobacillus sakei, Weissella viridescens, and Leuconostoc
mesenteroides. |
- Polyphenols from peel
extracts have antioxidant and radical scavenging properties - Peel and seed extracts and
nisin have synergic antimicrobial properties |
Avocado peel + nisin reduce
the amount of nisin to achieve antioxidant and antimicrobial effects |
Calderón-Oliver
et al. (2016) |
|
Antioxidant,
antimicrobial |
Hass |
Seed and peels AE and EE |
-
MIC, MBC, and MFC |
- Bactericidal effects in Gram positive and negative strains. - Extracts from seeds displayed better MCB than peels - Fungicidal effect in 2 strains for kernel extracts. |
-High activity against some bacteria and fungi strains |
Melgar
et al. (2018) |
Larvicidal |
Artemia salina and third stage Aedes aegypti larvae |
Avocado |
Seeds HE and ME |
-Toxicity tests using A. salina -Larvicidal in A. agypti |
Extracts active against larvae |
Alternative dengue control agents |
Leite et al. (2009) |
Radioprotective |
Sprague-Dawely rats |
Avocado |
Peel extracts |
Exposition to 6 MV X-Ray |
Avocado peel extract induced a greater recovery of
lymphocytes, red blood cells, and platelets to irradiate rats when compared
to rats without peel extract administration. SOD was
further increased |
Avocado peel extract acts as a radiation protective
agent for blood cells and major organs |
Kim et al. (2020) |
Toxic |
Acute and sub-acute toxicity in rats |
Avocado |
Seeds, EAE extract |
- IP administration of seed extract - IP subacute toxicity for 14 d at 75 and 150 mg·kg-1
BW |
-Acute toxicity study showed low LD50 - Liver and kidney had normal architecture after 14
d exposure -14 d-treatment decreased food consumption, BW, and
blood parameters |
Seed EAE had medium toxicity |
Taha et al. (2008) |
|
Toxicity in rats |
Avocado |
Seeds, AE |
- LD50 and mortality - Sub-acute experiments, doses at a quarter of the
maximum dose (10 mg·kg-1 BW) |
- Hematological parameters and ALT, AST, albumin and
creatinine not significantly altered. |
The seed extract was safe on acute and sub-acute
basis |
Ozolua et al. (2009) |
|
Oral acute toxicity in mice |
Avocado |
Seeds AE and ME |
-Hypolipidemic test - LD50 of seeds -Antioxidant -Oral Acute Toxicity |
-100% mortality after 6 d in the group fed with 2500
mg seeds·kg-1 BW -125 mg AS·kg-1 BW reduced the elevated
levels of total cholesterol |
AE and ME can be used for treating hyperlipidemia |
Pahua-Ramos et al. (2012) |
|
-Acute toxicity test in BALB/c mice -Genotoxicity |
Avocado |
Seed EE |
-LD50 -Genotoxicological study -
Erythrocyte micronucleus test |
-LD50 EE: 1200.75 mg·kg−1
BW -EE at 250 mg·kg−1 BW inhibited
micronucleus formation |
- EE induces acute toxicity at 500 mg·kg−1 - EE lacks mutagenic effects on blood cells |
Padilla-Camberos et al. (2013) |
|
Wistar Albino Rats:
-Hepatotoxicity -Liver enzymatic activity |
P.
americana
seeds |
Seed phenolics AE and EE |
AST, ALT, and ALP activities |
Hepatotoxic effect after oral
administration of phenolic AE |
- Liver damage - AE is hepatotoxic |
Umar et
al. (2016) |
Abbreviations. AE: aqueous
extract; AcE: acetone extract; AST: Aspartate
aminotransferase; ALT: Alanine aminotransferase; ALP: Alkaline phosphatase; BW:
body weight; CE: chloroform extract; EAE: ethyl acetate extract; EE: ethanol extract; HE: hexane extract; IP: intraperitoneal;
MBC minimum bactericidal concentrations, MFC: minimum
fungicidal concentrations; ME: methanol extract; MIC: minimum inhibitory
concentrations; PFA: polyhydroxylated fatty alcohols; RPMI: Roswell Park
Memorial Institute; SOD: superoxide dismutase; St: sterols; UFA: unsaturated
fatty acids
Antimicrobial
Information
on this activity is summarized in Table 4, and selected data on MIC (mg·mL-1)
and inhibition zone (mm) at 100 mg·mL-1 are displayed in Table 5.
The most widely used method to check the antimicrobial activity of AP extracts
was the agar disk technique, although the hole plate method and turbidimetry
were also used. Jiménez-Arellanes et al. (2013) tested chloroform
extract (CE) and EE of avocado seeds against Giardia lamblia, Entamoeba histolytica, and Trichomonas
vaginalis, and amoebicidal, giardicidal, trichomonicidal, and
antimycobacterial activities were found. The trypanocidal effects of ME of
seeds against Trypanosoma cruzi were checked by Abe et al.
(2005), and six hydroxylated fatty alcohols, i.e., acetogenins, were the bioactive compounds identified as
responsible for such actions. These showed moderate activity against
epimastigotes and trypomastigotes and thus can prevent T. cruzi disease,
the etiological agent for Chagas' illness. Leite et al. (2009) checked
the in vitro antifungal activity of avocado seeds against Cryptococcus
neoformans, Candida spp., and Malassezia pachydermatis
strains. The authors concluded that the extracts obtained from avocado seeds
can be used as dengue control agents.
Several authors tested AP extracts against
different pathogenic fungi: Adikaram et al. (1992) reported that
dichloromethane extract of peels exercised antifungal activity against Cladosporium
cladoposioides. Such activity Table 5: Selected
antimicrobial activity of extracts of avocado by-products
Variety / extract |
Bacillus cereus |
Bacillus subtilis |
Listeria
monocytogenes |
Staphylococcus aureus |
Staphylococcus
epidermidis |
Streptococcus
pyogenes |
Escherichia coli |
Klebsiella pneumoniae |
Pseudomonas
aeruginosa |
Pseudomonas spp. |
Salmonella
typhimurium |
Mycobacterium avium |
Yarrowia lipolytica |
Reference |
MIC (mg·mL-1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Seed, ethyl acetate extract a |
- |
20 |
- |
20 |
- |
20 |
40 |
30 |
30 |
- |
40 |
- |
- |
Idris et al. (2009) |
Seeds, water extract |
- |
- |
.09 |
- |
0.35 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Chia and Dykes (2010) |
Seeds, ethanol extract |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0.1 |
- |
Jiménez-Arellanes et
al. (2013) |
Seeds, chloroform extract |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0.02 |
- |
Jiménez-Arellanes
et al. (2013) |
Chloramphenicol |
- |
- |
240 |
70 |
- |
80 |
60 |
60 |
|
|
60 |
- |
- |
Sreedevi and
Pradeep (2016) |
Peel, ethanol:water,
(80:20 v/v) |
0.015 |
- |
0.030 |
0.030 |
- |
- |
0.30 |
- |
0.030 |
|
0.10 |
- |
- |
Melgar et al. (2018) |
Seeds, ethanol:water, (80:20 v/v) |
0.020 |
- |
0.030 |
0.030 |
- |
- |
0.15 |
- |
0.030 |
|
0.030 |
- |
- |
Melgar et al. (2018) |
Streptomycin |
0.10 |
- |
0.20 |
0.04 |
- |
- |
0.20 |
- |
0.20 |
|
0.25 |
- |
- |
Melgar et al. (2018) |
Inhibition
zone (mm) at 100 mg·mL-1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Seed, ethyl acetate extracta |
- |
32 |
- |
37 |
- |
35 |
16 |
27 |
22 |
- |
16 |
- |
- |
Idris et al. (2009) |
Seed, methyl alcohol-water |
- |
16.7-32.7 |
- |
20.8-30.5 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Nagaraj et al. (2010) |
Peel / Hass |
- |
- |
5.07 |
5.80 |
- |
- |
5.73 |
- |
- |
5.73 |
- |
- |
6.00 |
Rodríguez-Carpena et al. (2011) |
Seed / Hass |
9.20 |
- |
9.27 |
8.33 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Rodríguez-Carpena et al. (2011) |
Peel / Fuerte |
6.33 |
- |
5.80 |
5.33 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
5.73 |
- |
- |
5.53 |
Rodríguez-Carpena et al. (2011) |
Seed / Fuerte |
7.87 |
- |
7.33 |
6.80 |
- |
- |
7.67 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
5.20 |
Rodríguez-Carpena et al. (2011) |
Chloramphenicol |
20.0 |
- |
21.20 |
19.03 |
- |
- |
21.67 |
- |
- |
7.53 |
- |
- |
- |
Rodríguez-Carpena et al. (2011) |
Chloramphenicol |
- |
35.6 |
- |
34.0 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Nagaraj et al. (2010) |
a Extract displaying more potency among five different-polarity ones
was attributed to trihydroxy fragments, which later were
identified as hydroxylated fatty alcohols. Idris et al. (2009) tested
the activity of ethyl acetate extract (EAE), CE, and ME, which were compared
favorably with the activity of the standard streptomycin, while ME and EAE had
the lowest MIC value (10 mg·mL-1) against C. albicans.
Nagaraj et al. (2010) tested
several seed extracts against some bacterial pathogens, such as Bacillus
subtilis, which causes foodborne illness, and S. aureus, the
causative agent of impetigo, cellulitis, and scalded skin syndrome, being such
potential diseases for humans easily transmitted by food animals. Authors
assayed AE, EA, ME, and CE against the two above indicated bacteria, and
significant activity was found. Chia and Dykes (2010) tested the antimicrobial
activity of EA and AA of epicarps and seeds of several avocado varieties. The
EA showed antimicrobial activity (0.104–0.417 mg·mL-1) against
Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria (except for E. coli), while AE
was only active against Listeria monocytogenes and Staphylococcus
epidermidis. No inhibition by either EA and AA were observed against Aspergillus
flavus and Penicillium spp. Rodríguez-Carpena et al. (2011)
found highly antibacterial activity for AP against several pathogens and
spoilage microorganisms commonly found in meat products. The authors found
Gram-negative bacteria less sensitive than Gram-positive, as demonstrated by
the measured inhibition zone (mm) at 100 mg·mL-1. Rodríguez-Sánchez et
al. (2013) screened the AE of seeds, further fractionated, against active
endospores and vegetative cells of Clostridium sporogenes. Authors
performed bioassay-guided purification of crude extracts from seeds,
based on inhibitory properties, and linked antimicrobial activity to six
acetogenin compounds (Fig. 6, compounds 1–6). Both vegetative cells and active
endospores were inhibited by the extracts, and the MIC of isolated molecules
was found in the 7.8 to 15.6
Fig. 7: Chemical structures of
carotenoids contained in avocado by-products
Fig. 8: Chemical structure of phytic
acid identified in avocado by-products
μg·mL-1
range, while an enriched fraction at 19.5 μg·mL-1
showed bactericidal activity. The authors concluded that the isolated
compounds should be used as natural alternatives to antibiotics and additives
used by the food and pharmaceutical
Fig. 6: Chemical structures of acetogenins
identified in avocado by-products. Active compounds 1−6 isolated from an
avocado seed extract capable of inhibiting Clostridium sporogenes
PA 3679 (ATCC 7955) vegetative cell growth and endospore germination. 1, (2S,4S)-1-acetoxy-2,4-dihydroxy-n-heptadeca-16-ene;2,
persediene; 3, persenone-C;
4, persenone-A; 5, persenone-B;
6, persin (Rodríguez-Sánchez et al. 2013). Compounds
7-11 are anti-inflammatory, as described by Rosenblat
et al. (2011)
industries to inhibit Gram-positive spore-forming bacteria.
Nisin (an antimicrobial peptide) was assayed in
combination with AP extracts to improve the antimicrobial activity against some
food-borne bacteria such as Listeria, as well as the antioxidant
capacity (Calderón-Oliver et
al. 2016). Both peel and seed extracts-containing mixtures showed
antioxidant activity and radical scavenging capacity, which was attributed to
their polyphenolic composition, and a synergic antimicrobial response was noted
in the mixtures of both extracts in conjunction whit nisin. The highest
antimicrobial and antioxidant activities were obtained for a mixture containing
61% of peel extract with 39% of nisin. Later, the encapsulation of a mixture of
nisin and avocado peel extract by freeze and spray drying was
optimized. Table 6: Selected antioxidant activities reported for
avocado by-products
Variety |
Organ |
Antioxidant assays |
|
||||||
ABTS radical µmol Trolox·g-1 |
CUPRAC µmol Trolox·g-1 |
DPPH IC50 μg·mL−1 |
DPPH µmol Trolox·g−1 |
FRAP µmol FeSO4 g−1 |
ORAC µmol Trolox·g−1 |
TEAC μmol Trolox·g−1 |
Reference |
||
Avocado |
Seed FW |
236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soong and
Barlow (2004) |
Avocado |
Seed DW |
725 |
|
|
|
1484 |
|
|
Soong and
Barlow (2004) |
Avocado |
Seed DW |
1571-1888 |
|
|
|
27287-3078 |
|
|
Soong and
Barlow (2004) |
Avocado |
Peel DW |
|
|
3.83 |
|
|
|
|
Lee et al. (2008) |
Avocado |
Seed DW |
|
|
7.78 |
|
|
|
|
Lee et al. (2008) |
Several
cultivars |
Seed FW |
|
|
|
38-190 |
|
58.2-631 |
|
Wang et al. (2010) |
Several
cultivars |
Seed FW |
|
|
|
128-240 |
|
229-464 |
|
Wang et al. (2010) |
Hass |
Peel DW |
1457 |
|
|
|
1457 |
|
|
Tesfay et al. (2010) |
Hass |
Seed DW |
2593 |
|
|
|
1331 |
|
|
Tesfay et al.
(2010) |
Fuerte |
Peel FW |
35-242 |
104-456 |
|
35-175 |
|
|
|
Rodríguez-Carpena et al. (2011) |
Fuerte |
Seed FW |
38-195 |
96-353 |
|
28-167 |
|
|
|
Rodríguez-Carpena et al. (2011) |
Hass |
Peel FW |
16-104 |
56-218 |
|
18-89 |
|
|
|
Rodríguez-Carpena et al. (2011) |
Hass |
Seed FW |
22-158 |
58-275 |
|
18-66 |
|
|
|
Rodríguez-Carpena et al. (2011) |
Avocado |
Peel DW |
23.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
34.72 |
Deng et al.
(2012) |
Avocado |
Seed DW |
17.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
42.63 |
Deng et al.
(2012) |
Hass |
Peel DW |
|
|
|
|
|
470.0 |
161.0 |
Kosińska et al.
(2012) |
Hass |
Seed DW |
|
|
|
|
|
210.0 |
94.0 |
Kosińska et al.
(2012) |
Shepard |
Peel DW |
|
|
|
|
|
290.0 |
112.0 |
Kosińska et al. (2012) |
Shepard |
Seed DW |
|
|
|
|
|
350.0 |
91.0 |
Kosińska et al.
(2012) |
Avocado |
Seed DW |
173.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pahua-Ramos et
al. (2012) |
Hass |
Peel DW |
792 |
|
|
310 |
|
|
|
Daiuto et al. (2014) |
Hass |
Seed DW |
646 |
|
|
411 |
|
|
|
Daiuto et al.
(2014) |
Avocado |
Peel DW |
|
|
370.22 |
|
27.82 |
|
|
Morais et al. (2015) |
Avocado |
Seed DW |
|
|
46.47 |
|
23.71 |
|
|
Morais et al.
(2015) |
Avocado |
Peel FW |
|
|
|
16.10 |
9.56 a |
|
|
Rotta et al. (2015) |
Avocado |
Peel DW |
|
|
|
763.02 |
422.8 a |
|
|
Rotta et al. (2015) |
Hass |
Peel DW |
|
|
|
|
|
216.8 |
|
Calderón-Oliver et al. (2016) |
Hass |
Seed DW |
|
|
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
Calderón-Oliver et al. (2016) |
Hass |
Peel DW |
|
|
|
|
|
12.41-31.10
|
|
Saavedra et al. (2017) |
Hass |
Seed DW |
|
|
|
|
|
8.26-11.01 |
|
Saavedra et al. (2017) |
Fuerte |
Peel DW |
1004.5 |
|
|
420.5 |
1881.4 |
|
|
Tremocoldi et al.
(2018) |
Fuerte |
Seed DW |
580.8 |
|
|
464.9 |
931.7 |
|
|
Tremocoldi et al. (2018) |
Hass |
Peel, DW |
791.5 |
|
|
310 |
1175.1 |
|
|
Tremocoldi et al.
(2018) |
Hass |
Seed DW |
645.8 |
|
|
410.7 |
656.9 |
|
|
Tremocoldi et al.
(2018) |
Nariño |
Peel DW |
|
|
138.2 |
|
|
|
5,700 |
Rosero et al.
(2019) |
Nariño |
Seed DW |
|
|
320.1 |
|
|
|
3,200 |
Rosero et al.
(2019) |
Hass, Hass
type |
Peel FW |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.99-103.12 |
Ramos-Aguilar
et al. (2021) |
Ascorbic
acid |
|
8138.86 |
3009.68 |
|
54189.92 |
|
|
|
Tusevski et al.
(2014) |
α-tocopherol |
|
2685.04 |
2488.81 |
|
2221.83 |
|
|
|
Tusevski et al.
(2014) |
BHA |
|
2476.47 |
6422.31 |
|
4317.85 |
|
|
|
Tusevski et al.
(2014) |
a expressed as Fe2SO4.7H2O
Abbreviations: ABTS: 2,2'-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid; CUPRAC:
cupric reducing antioxidant capacity; DW: dry weight; DPPH:
2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl; FW: fresh weight; FRAP: Ferric Reducing
Antioxidant Power; ORAC: Oxygen Radical Absorbance Capacity; TEAC: trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity
The authors concluded that such microcapsules could be
used as functional ingredients (Calderón-Oliver et al. 2017).
The antimicrobial
activity measured as MIC and diameters of growth inhibition zones (mm) of AP
extracts is compared with that of chloramphenicol in Table 5. Chia and Dykes
(2010) and Jiménez-Arellanes et al. (2013) found extreme potency for all
AP extracts. Idris et al. (2009), found higher activity developed by AP
against some pathogenic bacteria than that showed by chloramphenicol, as
demonstrated by MIC methodology. Concerning the activity evaluated by the
diameter inhibition area methodology, Nagaraj et al. (2010) found growth
inhibitory activity of avocado seed extracts against B. subtilis and S.
aureus, which was similar to that exercised by chloramphenicol and
approximately ~4‒6
times higher than that found by other authors for S. aureus. Melgar et
al. (2018) found a high capacity of EA of AP against several bacterial and
fungal strains. MIC, Minimum Fungicidal Concentration (MFC), and Minimum
Bactericidal Concentration (MBC) were checked for 4 Gram-positive, 4
Gram-negative bacteria, and
Fig. 9: Chemical structures
of polyols identified in avocado by-products
Fig. 10: Chemical structures
of sterols identified in avocado by-products
7 microfungi. The activity was
found in 7 bacterial strains, and the seeds extracts showed better MBC than
peel extracts in 6 out of 8 strains, while the fungicidal effect was exercised
only by seeds extracts against some strains.
Differences in antimicrobial activities of AP found by
different authors could be related to diverse extraction procedures of AP,
bacterial strains assayed or can be due to the various methodologies used for
testing bacterial inhibition. In any case, all results indicate high
antibacterial activity for avocado peel and seed extracts.
Larvicidal activity
Leite
et al. (2009) tested HE and EE of avocado seeds against Artemia
salina and evaluated larvicidal activity against Aedes aegypti. They
concluded that the extracts obtained from avocado seeds merit further research
to be used against dengue.
Toxicity
of avocado by-products
Several
experiments were performed to determine the potential toxicity of avocado
seeds, which was mainly attributed to perseitol occurrence. Acute and sub-acute
toxicity in rats was determined by intraperitoneal (i.p.) administration of EAE
of avocado seeds (Taha et al. 2008). At the end of a 14 d-trial, it was
found that the liver and kidney showed normal architecture and that the
treatment decreased food consumption, BW, and blood parameters, concluding that
the EAE induced relatively low toxicity. Another experiment was performed on
rats to assess the possible toxicity of the AE of seeds (Ozolua et al.
2009). The authors calculated LD50 and found that hematological
parameters and the levels of albumin, creatinine, alanine aminotransferase
(ALT), and aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), remained unchanged. Moreover, the
seed extract was found to be safe on an acute and sub-acute basis. Pahua-Ramos et al. (2012) performed oral acute
toxicity assays in mice-feed avocado seeds. They found hypolipidemic and
antioxidant effects while feeding with 2.5 g of avocado seeds·kg-1
BW for 6 d induced a 100% of mortality; however, it was noted that125 mg of
avocado seeds·kg-1 BW reduced the elevated levels of total
cholesterol. Thus, it was concluded that both AS and ME or avocado seed flour
can be used for treating hyperlipidemia. Padilla-Camberos et al. (2013)
performed an acute toxicity test in male BALB/c mice, obtaining an LD50
for the seed extract of 1200.75 mg·kg-1. It was found that 250 mg·kg-1
of extract and the negative control induced a low amount of micronucleated
cells; however, in vivo mutagenicity on peripheral blood cells after
seed extract supplementation was not observed. Umar et al. (2016)
assayed hepatotoxic effects of AE and PE of avocado seed on liver enzymatic
activity. They found that a daily oral administration of both AE and PE of
seeds during 3 weeks at 500 mg·kg-1 BW showed hepatotoxic effects.
Such actions were also tested for liver enzymes by checking AST, ALT, and
alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activities. It was found that a daily oral
administration of AE and PE of seeds for 3 weeks at 0.5 g·kg-1 induced
minor liver damage.
As seen, most experimentation showed weak toxicological
effects, which occur only at high doses of seed extracts. Moreover, all
experiments were conducted using mice and rats, which can be useful to discern
the possible toxicity of AP for humans; however, other animal models designed
to evaluate possible toxicity for farm animals remain poorly
developed. This deprives knowing the precise use of such by-products to feed
farm animals and given the appropriate nutrient composition and phytochemical
profiles of AP, further experimentation on this subject is necessary.
Antioxidant
activity
Oxidative
stress has been cited as responsible for early events conducting to the
development of important infectious diseases in farm animals, such as pneumonia
and enteritis. Given that oxidative stress should be easily prevented with
antioxidants, the use of antioxidant-rich feeds could be a positive action in
farm animals (Lykkesfeldt and Svendsen 2007).
This capacity is usually determined through in vitro
studies. But Oboh (2013) tested several phenolic
extracts of different avocado organs in rat’s pancreas through a Fe2+
induced lipid peroxidation test. All the extracts caused a significant decrease
in malondialdehyde contents in the pancreas in a dose-dependent manner, and the
seed had the highest inhibitory effect on Fe2+ induced lipid
peroxidation (IC50 = 60.61 µg·mL-1).
The authors concluded that the phenolic extracts of several AP were able for
protecting the pancreas from in vitro lipid peroxidation. This action
was attributed to phenolics, due to their reducing power, Fe2+
chelating, and radical scavenging abilities.
In vitro performed colorimetric
and fluorometric antioxidant capacity tests are based on Hydrogen Atom Transfer
(HAT) mechanism. Usually, HAT-based methods monitor competitive reaction
kinetics. These methods generally used a synthetic-free radical generator, e.g., the 2,2′-azinobis
(3-ethylbenzothiazolline-6-sulfonic acid (ABTS). Generally, the antioxidant
capacity usually checks the ability of the antioxidants in controlling the
degree of oxidation, and the antioxidant capacity tests can be based on the
peroxyl radical scavenging, such as those based on the total radical trapping
antioxidant parameter (TRAP); oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC);
metal-reducing power such as ferric reducing/antioxidant power (FRAP); hydroxyl
radical scavenging such as deoxyribose assay; organic radical scavenging such
as ABTS, and 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH); and cupric
reducing/antioxidant power (CUPRAC) (Karadag et al. 2009).
The results of the antioxidant activities of AP compared
to ascorbic acid, α-tocopherol, and butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA) checked
by various methodologies are displayed in Table 6. Notice that the results
obtained for the antioxidant potential of the various extracts of seeds and
peels for the same test are quite variable. This variability could be related
to the use of by-products from different avocado varieties, and obtained from
fruits in different maturation stages and cultivated following different
agronomic protocols and under various climates. Good antioxidant activity was found
in most of the extracts, albeit with many fluctuations, at about a tenth of
that showed by checked pure molecules, i.e.,
ascorbic acid, α-tocopherol, and BHA. The antioxidant activity detected in
both peels and seeds was found to be dependent on the type of test performed.
For instance, Tesfay et al. (2010) found by the ABTS test higher
antioxidant capacity for seeds than for peels; however, by the FRAP test the
results were the opposite. On the other hand, an increase in the antioxidant
capacity was detected in dried seeds and peels in comparison with fresh
by-products. In this regard, Rotta et al. (2015) indicated an increase
of up to 100 times this capacity for dried seeds, which is in good agreement
with the findings of Soong and Barlow (2004), who reported that this phenomenon
could be related to the production of Maillard-type antioxidants, although
several other natural lipophilic antioxidants could have been degraded by
drying. In addition, the surplus of the antioxidant activity might be related to
the formation of polyphenols. As shown in Table 6, all tests indicate that both
avocado peels and seeds have good antioxidant activities, which can be useful
for increasing the health of farm animals.
Use
of avocado by-products for feeding farm animals
Avocado
has been cited as conditionally toxic for some animals, however ill effects of
AP seem to be animal species-dependent, and healthy actions by feeding with AP
have been found in some animals, such as pigs. The entire avocado fruits are
commonly used as feed for pigs because of their high digestibility. However, it
has been reported that the whole avocado fruit as pig feedstuff has lower
nutritional value than the pulp and that the nutritive value of fruits varies
according to cultivar. The seeds have higher nutritive value than peels, as
evaluated in pigs by the mobile nylon bag technique (Carmenatti et al.
2015). The protein concentrations were found to be higher in pulps and peels
than in the seeds of avocado varieties; however, the whole avocado fruit is
easily digestible, and therefore fruit discards could be used for feeding pigs,
although protein supplementation would be needed when AP constitute an
important portion of pig diets (Ly et al. 2021). Overall, AP develop
health actions in the muscles of pigs: it improves the FA composition,
oxidation state and color stability of meat, and the composition of
intramuscular fat. Also, the consumption of such by-products increases the
degree of fat unsaturation, while the color of the muscles of pigs is better
preserved from oxidation (Hernández-López et al. 2016). Positive results
when feeding pigs with avocado peels were obtained also in rural Busia
District, Kenya, by Mutua et al. (2012).
AP have been used successfully to feed ruminants. To
this end, it has been proposed the avocado meal, which is an oil-extracted
by-product from avocado fruits lacking commercial value, which contains high
amounts of fiber. Given the high degradability of its dry matter, this AP has
been proposed for ruminant diets (Skenjana et al. 2006). Generally, AP
have been positively evaluated for feeding goats and sheep. For instance, it
has been observed that a mix of avocado seeds and orange peels meal, in a 25:35
ratio, has the potential to positively replace guinea grass in the diet of West
African Dwarf male growing sheep (Okoruwa et al. 2015). Moreover, a
trial using avocado waste (a mixture of pulp and peels) included in
multi-nutrient blocks for feeding goats was successfully conducted by Evan et
al. (2020). These workers found an improvement in the quality of the FA
profile of milk, while milk yield was unaffected. Authors reported that the
intake of multi-nutrient blocks containing 14.8% AP was low, probably due to
the oxidation and rancidity of avocado lipids. Interestingly, no changes were
noted in milk production, however, feeding blocks with AP increased milk fat
content with minor changes in the FA profile of fat milk.
In aquaculture, the use of AP is highly recommended.
These can constitute an energy source in fish farms, which are highly dependent
on local resources. This assumption was made mainly based on the contents of
crude protein and fat, and also considering the effectiveness of removing
anti-nutritional constituents (Kassahun et al. 2012). In this regard,
the antioxidant properties of a tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) diet
with the inclusion of AP were evaluated. An increasing pattern was observed for
both the antioxidant activity and the total phenolic compounds content as the
level of AP inclusion increased. Therefore, AP was considered a good fed
ingredient in aquaculture diets because of their antioxidant properties and the
added value granted by its use (Jiménez-Ruiz et al. 2019).
In birds, the results appear to be contradictory. In
this way, it was investigated the effectiveness of avocado seed powder-based
supplements on meat quality and the liver and kidney physiology of culled
female quails (Coturnix coturnix japonica). The results of the experimentation
showed that avocado seed powder-containing supplements significantly improved
the level of serum glutamic pyruvate transaminase (GPT), creatinine, urea, fat,
protein, cholesterol, meat tenderness, and cooking loss. Thus, avocado seed
powder-containing supplements improved meat quality and the liver and kidney
physiology of the culled female quail (Tugiyanti et al. 2019).
Similarly, Akinduro et al. (2021), proposed the use of avocado seed
powder in broiler chicken diets. Authors demonstrated that avocado seed powder
can be used in broiler chickens for up to 5.5% of the total diet, and such
inclusion led to an improved feed conversion ratio and carcass growth. However,
Van Ryssen et al. (2013) warmed against the inclusion of AP in broilers’
diets This was evidenced by some trials in that such waste induced poor
performance of the birds, although no symptoms of toxicity were observed at the
end of the experiments.
Despite the positive effects referenced, avocado fruits
have been associated with congestive heart failure related to severe
cardiomyopathy in goats, sheep, horses, and ostriches (Stadler et al.
1991). Low doses develop aseptic mastitis in horses and goats, while high
intake of the fruits of some avocado cultivars has poisoned budgerigars, birds,
cats, mice, rats, horses, rabbits, cattle and goats, and canaries, among
others, and possibly dogs (Kellerman et al. 2005). Persin has been cited
as responsible for the toxicity of avocado peels and seeds, being considered a
fungicidal toxin found in the leaves and fruits of the avocado tree. The lethal
dose is characteristic of each animal species. The mechanism by which avocado
compounds act is by triggering fluid accumulation in the lungs, leading to
difficulty breathing, and death takes place due to oxygen deprivation. Fluid
accumulation can also occur in the pancreas, heart, and abdomen (Buoro et
al. 1994).
To use AP as livestock feed, the excessive amount of
bioactive compounds in AP could be decreased by hydrothermal treatment. This
was successfully applied to avocado seeds to reduce bioactive compounds and
fiber contents to safe levels, and different boiling times were investigated.
Results showed a significant reduction in the fiber fractions and bioactive
compounds as the boiling time increased when compared with the raw seeds, and
iron was significantly higher in the treated samples than in the raw ones.
Moreover, the energy values showed a slight increase from the raw at 30 min of
hydrothermal treatment (Ibhaze 2017). Although persin
was not analyzed in this work, this bioactive would probably follow the same
trend as the other bioactive compounds.
The experimentation developed to feed PA to farm animals
shows highly contradictory results. Probably, the toxicity or beneficial
effects of PA in farm animals are due to the different levels of persin in the
various PA, whose concentration is dependent on the type of avocado cultivar
considered. Therefore, pending new research, it is advisable to use PA in
mixtures with other by-products or, alternatively, to carry out hydrothermal
treatments to reduce bioactive compounds included in PA to safe levels,
according to the experimentation shown.
Conclusions
As
exposed in this work, avocado waste, i.e., peels and seeds, contain suitable
amounts of several health-enhancing compounds for farm animals. Avocado peels contain a great variety of
phenolic acids and flavonol glycosides, while the seeds contain mainly flavanol
monomers, procyanidins, and hydroxycinnamic acids. Other highly relevant
phytochemicals found in avocado by-products are acetogenins, which have
antimicrobial, antibacterial, and spore germination inhibiting effects, and
whose occurrence is restricted to Annonaceae and Lauraceae.
The utilization of avocado by-products to feed farm animals could become an
important tool for adequate by-products management to ensure ecologically and
sustainable production. Comprehensive experiments in farm animals are needed,
including not only the use of pure phytochemicals but also feeding animals with
raw by-products to ensure cheap exploitation and sustainability of the
production processes. Also, rigorously toxicological experiments clarifying the
possible toxic effects of avocado by-products cited in some farm animals are
needed, while studies on nutritional aspects of avocado by-products such as the
aminoacyl composition of the various seeds and peels varieties, will help to
discern the nutritional potential of these by-products. Furthermore, the
reduction of bioactive compounds contained in avocado by-products through
different treatments, such as hydrothermal ones, should be enhanced. Not only
in terms of the composition of the resulting product, but also in terms of the
health of farm animals fed with such by-products.
The
author acknowledge the financial support of Vicerrectorado de Investigación e
Innovación of University of Almería (Project 2020/00001014), Junta de Andalucia
(Proyect P20_00806), Campus de Excelencia Internacional Agroalimentario
(ceiA3), and Centro de Investigación en Agrosistemas Intensivos Mediterráneos y
biotecnología Agroalimentaria (CIAMBITAL).
Author Contributions
JLGG conducted the study, performed the literature search, the data
extraction and wrote all parts of this paper.
Conflicts
of Interest
The author declare no conflict of interest of any sort.
Data Availability
I hereby declare that the data relevant to this paper is available and
will be provided on request.
Ethics Approval
This study does not involve human subjects. Thus, ethics approval is not
required.
References
Abe F, S Nagafuji, M Okawa, J
Kinjo, H Akahane, T Ogura, MA Martinez-Alfaro, R Reyes-Chilpa (2005). Trypanocidal
constituents in plants 5. Evaluation of some Mexican plants for their
trypanocidal activity and active constituents in the seeds of Persea
americana. Biol Pharm Bull 28:1314‒1317
Adikaram NKB, DF Ewing, AM
Karunaratne, EMK Wijeratne (1992). Antifungal compounds from immature avocado
fruit peel. Phytochemistry 31:93‒96
Akinduro VO, EK Asaniyan, VF
Adekunle (2021). Growth, carcass and organ of broiler chickens fed finisher
diets with avocado pear (Persea americana)
seed powder. Uniosun J Agric Renew Res 4:1‒13
Alkhalf MI, WS Alansari, EA
Ibrahim, ME ELhalwagy (2019). Anti-oxidant, anti-inflammatory and anti-cancer
activities of avocado (Persea americana) fruit and seed extract. J
King Saud Univ Sci 31:1358‒1362
Araújo RG, RM Rodriguez-Jasso,
HA Ruiz, MME Pintado, CN Aguilar (2018). Avocado by-products: Nutritional and
functional properties. Trends Food Sci Technol 80:51‒60
Ashton OB, M Wong, TK McGhie, R
Vather, Y Wang, C Requejo-Jackman, P Ramankutty, AB Woolf (2006). Pigments in
avocado tissue and oil. J Agric Food Chem 54:10151‒10158
Athaydes BR, GM Alves, ALEMD
Assis, JVD Gomes, RP Rodrigues, BP Campagnaro, BV Nogueira, D Silveira, RM
Kuster, TMC Pereira, RR Kitagawa (2019). Avocado seeds (Persea americana
Mill.) prevents indomethacin-induced gastric ulcer in mice. Food Res Intl
119:751‒760
Bressani R, B Rodas, AS Ruiz (2009).
La composición química, capacidad
antioxidativa y valor nutritivo de la semilla de variedades de aguacate, Fondo
Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología-FONACYT,
Universidad del Valle de Guatemala-UVG, Tegucigalpa, Guatemala
Buoro IBJ, SB Nyamwange, D Chai,
SM Munyua (1994). Putative avocado toxicity in two dogs. Onderstepoort
J Vet Res 61:107‒109
Calderón-Oliver M, HB
Escalona-Buendía, ON Medina-Campos, J Pedraza-Chaverri, R Pedroza-Islas, E
Ponce-Alquicira (2016). Optimization of the antioxidant
and antimicrobial response of the combined effect of nisin and avocado
byproducts. LWT-Food Sci Technol 65:46‒52
Carmenatti JL, J Bugarin, ML
Alonso-Spilbury, JG Rodríguez-Carpena, V Orozco, CL Flores (2015). Use of the
mobile nylon bag technique for measuring in situ digestibility of some supplies
food and avocado in pigs. Trop Subtrop Agroecosyst18:221‒229
Cid-Pérez TS, PO
Hernández-Carranza, CE Velasco, II Ruiz-López, GV Nevárez-Moorillón, R
Ávila-Sosa (2021). Avocado seeds (Persea americana cv. Criollo spp.): Lipophilic
compounds profile and biological activities. Saud J
Biol Sci 28:3384–3390
Cueva C, MV Moreno-Arribas, PJ
Martín-Álvarez, G Bills, MF Vicente, A Basilio, CL Rivas, T Requena, JM Rodríguez,
B Bartolomé (2010). Antimicrobial activity of
phenolic acids against commensal, probiotic and pathogenic bacteria. Res
Microbiol 161:372–382
Dabas D, RJ Elias, GR Ziegler,
JD Lambert (2019). In vitro
antioxidant and cancer inhibitory activity of a colored avocado seed extract. Intl
J Food Sci 2019:1–7
Daiuto ÉR, MA Tremocoldi, SMD Alencar, RL Vieites, PH
Minarelli (2014). Chemical composition and
antioxidant activity of the pulp, peel and by products of avocado'Hass. Rev Bras Fruticult
36:417‒424
Deng GF, C Shen, XR Xu, RD Kuang, YJ Guo, LS Zeng, LL
Gao, X Lin, JF Xie, EQ Xia, S Li (2012). Potential of fruit wastes as natural
resources of bioactive compounds. Intl J Mol Sci 13:8308‒8323
Ding H, YW Chin, AD Kinghorn, SM
D’Ambrosio (2007). Chemopreventive characteristics of avocado fruit. In: Seminars
Cancer Biology, Vol.
17, pp:386‒394.
Academic Press, London
Dixon RA, DY Xie, SB Sharma (2005).
Proanthocyanidins — a final frontier in flavonoid research? New Phytol
165:9–28
Domínguez MP, K Araus, P Bonert, F Sánchez, GS
Miguel, M Toledo (2014). The Avocado and its waste. An approach of fuel
potential/application. In: Environment, Energy and Climate Change Vol. 2, pp:199–223. Springer
International Publishing, Switzerland
Evan TD, MD Carro, JEF Yepes, A
Haro, L Arbesú, M Romero-Huelva, E Molina-Alcaide (2020). Effects
of feeding multinutrient blocks including avocado pulp and peels to dairy goats
on feed intake and milk yield and composition. Animals 10:194–205
FAO (2019). Food and Agriculture
Organization of the United Nations, Statistical Division, 2019. http://faostat3.fao.org/download/Q/QC/E/
(Accessed 05 March 2021)
Figueroa JG, I Borrás-Linares, J
Lozano-Sánchez, A Segura-Carretero (2018). Comprehensive
identification of bioactive compounds of avocado peel by liquid chromatography
coupled to ultra-high-definition accurate-mass Q-TOF. Food
Chem 245:707–716
Guil-Guerrero, JL, L Ramos, C
Moreno, JC Zúñiga-Paredes, M Carlosama-Yepez, P Ruales (2016a). Plant-food by-products to improve
farm-animal health. Anim Feed Sci Technol
220:121–135
Guil-Guerrero JL, L Ramos, C Moreno,
JC Zúñiga-Paredes, M Carlosama-Yepez, P Ruales (2016b). Antimicrobial activity
of plant-food by-products: A review focusing on the tropics. Livest Sci 189:32–49
Guil-Guerrero JL, L Ramos, C
Moreno, JC Zúñiga-Paredes, M Carlosama-Yepez, P Ruales (2016c). Plant foods by-products
as sources of health-promoting agents for animal production: A review focusing
on the tropics. Agron J
108:1759–1774
Guri AJ, R Hontecillas, H Si, D Liu,
J Bassaganya-Riera (2007). Dietary abscisic
acid ameliorates glucose tolerance and obesity-related inflammation in db/db
mice fed high-fat diets. Clin Nutr 26:107–116
Hagerman AE, KM Riedl, GA Jones,
KN Sovik, NT Ritchard, PW Hartzfeld, TL Riechel (1998). High molecular weight
plant polyphenolics (tannins) as biological antioxidants. J Agric Food Chem
46:1887–1892
Heinonen M (2007). Antioxidant
activity and antimicrobial effect of berry phenolics — a Finnish perspective. Mol
Nutr Food Res 51:684–691
Hernández-Brenes C, MI
García-Cruz, JA Gutiérrez-Uribe, JA Benavides-Lozano, DG Rodríguez-Sánchez (2013).
Antimicrobial, antibacterial and spore germination inhibiting activity from
an avocado extract enriched in bioactive compounds. U.S.
Patent Application No. 13/763,262
Hernández-López SH, JG
Rodríguez-Carpena, C Lemus-Flores, F Grageola-Nuñez, M Estévez (2016). Avocado
waste for finishing pigs: Impact on muscle composition and oxidative stability
during chilled storage. Meat Sci 116:186–192
Ibhaze GA (2017). Influence of
hydrothermal treatment duration on the nutritional quality of avocado pear (Persia
americana) seed meal for livestock feeding. Anim Res Intl 14:2759–2763
Idris S, G Ndukwe, C Gimba (2009).
Preliminary phytochemical screening and antimicrobial activity of seed extracts
of Persea americana (avocado pear). Bayero J Pure Appl Sci 2:173–176
Imafidon KE, FC Amaechina (2010).
Effects of aqueous seed extract of Persea americana Mill. (avocado) on blood
pressure and lipid profile in hypertensive rats. Adv Biol Res 4:116–121
Jeong WS, ANT Kong (2004).
Biological properties of monomeric and polymeric catechins: Green tea catechins
and procyanidins. Pharm Biol
42:84–93
Jiménez-Arellanes A, J Luna-Herrera,
R Ruiz-Nicolás, J Cornejo-Garrido, A Tapia, L Yépez-Mulia (2013). Antiprotozoal
and antimycobacterial activities of
Persea
americana
seeds.
BMC Compl
Altern
Med
13:109–113
Jiménez-Ruiz
EI,
JG
Rodríguez-Carpena, GP
Hernández-Ortega,
MT Sumaya-Martínez, R Balois-Morales,
LM Sánchez-Herrera, VP Peraza-Gómez (2019). Antioxidant properties of a tilapia
(Oreochromis niloticus) diet with the inclusion of avocado by-product. Biotecnia
21:163–169
Karadag A, B Ozcelik, S Saner (2009).
Review of methods to determine antioxidant capacities. Food Anal Meth
2:41–60
Kashman Y, I Néeman, A Lifshit (1969a).
New compounds from avocado pear. Tetrahedron 25:4617–4631
Kashman Y, I Néeman, A Lifshitz (1969b).
Six new c17‐olefinic
and acetylenic oxygenated compounds from avocado pear. Israel J Chem
7:173–176
Kassahun A, H Waidbacher, W
Zollitsch (2012). Proximate composition of selected potential feedstuffs for
small-scale aquaculture in Ethiopia. Livest
Res Rur Dev 24:1–118
Kellerman TS, JAW Coetzer, TW
Naude, CJ Botha (2005). Plant Poisonings and Mycotoxicosis of Livestock in
Southern Africa. Oxford University Press Southern Africa, Cape Town, South
Africa
Kim SM, CW Rico, SC Lee, MY Kang
(2010). Modulatory effect of rice bran and phy tic acid on glucose metabolism
in high fat-fed C57BL/6N mice. J Clin Biochem Nutr 47:12–17
Kim JO, JH Shin, DY Jung, CH
Jeon, JE Lee, YJ Lee, BI Min (2020). Evaluating the radioprotective effect of
avocado peel extracts upon rat exposed to 6 MV x-ray. J Kor Soc Radiol
14:553–561
Klopfenstein TJ, R Angel, G
Cromwell, GE Erickson, DG Fox, C Parsons, LD Satter, AL Sutton, DH Baker, A
Lewis, D Meyer (2002). Animal diet modification to decrease the potential for
nitrogen and phosphorus pollution. Counc
Agric Sci Technol 21:175–188
Kosińska A, M
Karamać, I Estrella, T Hernández, B Bartolomé, GA Dykes (2012).
Phenolic compound profiles and antioxidant capacity of Persea americana
Mill. peels and seeds of two varieties. J Agric Food Chem 60:4613–4619
Kumar R, S Vaithiyanathan (1990).
Occurrence, nutritional significance and effect on animal productivity of tannins
in tree leaves. Anim Feed Sci Technol 30:21–38
Lee SG, MH Yu, SP Lee, IS Lee (2008).
Antioxidant activities and induction of apoptosis by methanol extracts from
avocado. J Kor Soc Food Sci Nutr 37:269–275
Leite JJG, ÉHS Brito, RA
Cordeiro, RSN Brilhante, JJC Sidrim, LM Bertini, SMD Morais, MFG Rocha (2009).
Chemical composition, toxicity and larvicidal and antifungal activities of Persea
americana (avocado) seed extracts. Rev Soc Bras Med
Trop 42:110–113
Ly J, P Fránquez, G Rodríguez, C
Lemus, IA Domínguez, F Grageola (2021). Note on in
vitro digestion of avocado products for pigs. S Afr
J Anim Sci 51:138–141
Lykkesfeldt J, O Svendsen (2007).
Oxidants and antioxidants in disease: oxidative stress in farm animals. Vet
J 173:502–511
Melgar B, MI Dias, A Ciric, M
Sokovic, EM Garcia-Castello, AD Rodriguez-Lopez, L Barros, IC Ferreira (2018). Bioactive
characterization of Persea americana Mill. by-products: A rich source of
inherent antioxidants. Indust Crops Prod 111:212–218
Morais
DR, EM Rotta, SC Sargi, EM Schmidt, EG Bonafe, MN
Eberlin, AC Sawaya, JV Visentainer (2015). Antioxidant activity, phenolics and
UPLC–ESI (–)–MS of extracts from different tropical fruits parts and processed
peels. Food Res Intl 77:392–399
Msika P, J Legrand, S Garnier (2013).
Use of avocado skin for obtaining an avocado unsaponifiable material
enriched with saturated aliphatic hydrocarbons and with sterols. US Patent
Application No. 14/370,892
Mutua FK, C Dewey, S Arimi, W
Ogara, M Levy, E Schelling (2012). A description of local pig feeding systems
in village smallholder farms of Western Kenya. Trop Anim Health Prod
44:1157–1162
Nagaraj M, V Sandhya, G Supriya,
R Manju, K Pranitha, B Shivaji, V Lalitha, B Kiran (2010). Antioxidant and
antibacterial activity of avocado (Persea gratissima Gaertner.) seed
extract. World Appl Sci J 9:695–698
Negesse T, HPS Makkar, K Becker (2009).
Nutritive value of some non-conventional feed resources of Ethiopia determined
by chemical analyses and an In vitro gas method. Anim Feed Sci Technol
154:204–217
Oboh G (2013). Inhibitory effect
of phenolic extract from leaf and fruit of avocado pear (Persea americana)
on Fe2+ induced lipid peroxidation in rats’pancreas in vitro.
Futa J Res Sci 2:276–286
Okoruwa
MI, ETE Ehebha, E Omoragbon (2015). Replacement value
of avocado seeds with orange peels meal for guinea grass on growth performance
and nutrient digestibility of growing sheep. Intl J Res 2:35–40
Ozolua
R, O Anaka, S Okpo, S Idogun (2009). Acute and
sub-acute toxicological assessment of the aqueous seed extract of Persea
americana Mill (Lauraceae) in rats. Afr
J Trad Compl Altern Med 6:573–578
Padilla-Camberos E, M
Martínez-Velázquez, JM Flores-Fernández, S Villanueva-Rodríguez (2013). Acute
toxicity and genotoxic activity of avocado seed extract (Persea americana Mill.,
cv Hass). Sci World J 2013:1–4
Pahua-Ramos ME, A Ortiz-Moreno, G
Chamorro-Cevallos, MD Hernández-Navarro, L Garduño-Siciliano, H
Necoechea-Mondragón, M Hernández-Ortega (2012). Hypolipidemic
effect of avocado (Persea americana Mill) seed in a hypercholesterolemic
mouse model. Plant Foods Hum Nutr 67:10–16
Pallauf J, G Rimbach (1997).
Nutritional significance of phytic acid and phytase. Arch Anim Nutr 50:301–319
Pechinskii SV, AG Kuregyan (2014).
The Impact of Carotenoids on Immunity (Review). Pharm Chem J 47:509–513
Piccirilli A, N Piccardi, P
Msika, F Paul, S Bredif (2015). Use of a compound comprising
D-mannoheptulose and/or perseitol for treating and preventing innate immunity
modification diseases. U.S. Patent No. 9,023,810. U.S. Patent and Trademark
Office, Washington DC, USA
Puiggros F, N Llopiz, A Ardevol, C
Blade, L Arola, MJ Salvado (2005). Grape seed
procyanidins prevent oxidative injury by modulating the expression of
antioxidant enzyme systems. J Agric Food
Chem 53:6080–6086
Ramos MDR, G Jerz, S Villanueva, F
López-Dellamary, R Waibel, P Winterhalter (2004). Two
glucosylated abscisic acid derivates from avocado seeds (Persea americana Mill.
Lauraceae cv. Hass). Phytochemistry 65:955‒962
Ramos-Aguilar AL, J Ornelas-Paz, LM
Tapia-Vargas, AA Gardea-Béjar, EM Yahia, JD Jesús Ornelas-Paz, S Ruiz-Cruz, C
Rios-Velasco, P Escalante-Minakata (2021). Effect of
cultivar on the content of selected phytochemicals in avocado peels. Food
Res Intl 140:110024
Raymond Chia TW, GA Dykes (2010).
Antimicrobial activity of crude epicarp and seed extracts from mature avocado
fruit (Persea americana) of three cultivars. Pharm
Biol 48:753–756
Rodas BD, CM Luhman, BL Miller,
PA Porter (2015). Method and composition for improving the health of young
monogastric mammals. U.S. Patent No. 9,078,457. U.S. Patent and Trademark
Office, Washington DC, USA
Rodríguez-Carpena JG, D Morcuende,
MJ Andrade, P Kylli, M Estévez (2011). Avocado (Persea
americana Mill.) phenolics, in vitro
antioxidant and antimicrobial activities, and inhibition of lipid and protein
oxidation in porcine patties. J Agric Food Chem 59:5625–5635
Rodríguez-Sánchez DG, A Pacheco,
MI García-Cruz, JA Gutiérrez-Uribe, JA Benavides-Lozano, C
Hernández-Brenes (2013). Isolation and structure elucidation of avocado
seed (Persea americana) lipid derivatives that inhibit Clostridium
sporogenes endospore germination. J Agric Food Chem 61:7403–7411
Rodríguez-Saona C, JT Trumble (2000). Biologically
active aliphatic acetogenins from specialized idioblast oil cells. Curr Org
Chem 4:1249–1260
Rosenblat GS, Meretski, J Segal,
M Tarshis, A Schroeder, A Zanin-Zhorov, G Lion, A Ingber, M Hochberg (2011).
Polyhydroxylated fatty alcohols derived from avocado suppress inflammatory
response and provide non-sunscreen protection against UV-induced damage in skin
cells. Arch Dermat Res 303:239–246
Rosero JC, S Cruz, C Osorio, N
Hurtado (2019). Analysis of phenolic composition of byproducts (Seeds and
Peels) of avocado (Persea americana Mill.) cultivated in Colombia. Molécula
24:3209–3225
Rotta EM, DR De Morais, PBF Biondo,
VJ Dos Santos, M Matsushita, JV Visentainer (2015). Use
of avocado peel (Persea americana) in tea formulation: A functional
product containing phenolic compounds with antioxidant activity. Acta Sci
Technol 38:23–29
Ryssen JBJV, A Skenjana, WAV
NIekerk (2013). Can avocado meal replace maize meal in broiler diets? Appl
Anim Husb Rur Dev 6:22–27
Saavedra J, A Córdova, R Navarro, P
Díaz-Calderón, C Fuentealba, C Astudillo-Castro, L Toledo, J Enrione, L Galvez
(2017). Industrial avocado waste:
Functional compounds preservation by convective drying process. J Food Eng 198:81–90
Saavedra MJ, A Borges, C Dias, A
Aires, RN Bennett, ES Rosa, M Simões (2010). Antimicrobial activity of
phenolics and glucosinolate hydrolysis products and their synergy with
streptomycin against pathogenic bacteria. Med
Chem 6:174–183
Schaffer BA, BN Wolstenholme (2013).
The Avocado: Botany, Production and Uses. Whiley AW CABI Publishing, New
York, USA
Shamlan G (2020). Ethanolic and aqueous
extracts of avocado (Persea americana) seeds attenuates
doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity in male albino rats. Arab J Sci Eng 46:5265–5274
Skenderidis
P, S Leontopoulos, K Petrotos, I Giavasis (2021).
Vacuum microwave-assisted aqueous extraction of polyphenolic compounds from avocado
(Persea Americana) solid waste. Sustainability 13:2166–2182
Skenjana
A, JBJV Niekerk, WAV Ryssen (2006). In vitro
digestibility and in situ degradability of avocado meal and macadamia waste
products in sheep. S Afr J Anim Sci 36:78–81
Soong YY, PJ Barlow (2004).
Antioxidant activity and phenolic content of selected fruit seeds. Food Chem
88:411–417
Sreedevi R, BV Pradeep (2016).
Anthelmintic and antibacterial activity of red pigment from Aspergillus
terreus. Res J Pharm Biol Chem Sci 72:249–257
Stadler P, IBJV Rensburg, T
Naude (1991). Suspected avocado (Persea
americana): Poisoning in goats. J S Afr Vet Assoc 62:186–188
Storey
WB,
B Bergh, GA Zentmyer (1986). The origin, indigenous range and dissemination
of
the
avocado.
Calif Avocado
Soc Yearbook
70:127–133
Taha NA, AAM Alkhawajah, KK
Raveesha (2008). Acute and subacute toxicity studies of Persea americana
Mill (Avocado) seed in rats. Intl J Med Toxicol Legal Med 11:31–36
Takenaga F, K Matsuyama, S Abe,
Y Torii, S Itoh (2008). Lipid and fatty acid composition of mesocarp and seed
of avocado fruits harvested at northern range in Japan. J Oleo Sci
57:591–597
Talabi JY, OA Osukoya, OO Ajayi,
GO Adegoke (2016). Nutritional and antinutritional compositions of processed
Avocado (Persea americana Mill) seeds. Asian J Plant Sci Res 6:6–12
Tesfay SZ, I Bertling, JP Bower (2010).
Anti-oxidant levels in various tissues during the maturation of ‘Hass’ avocado
(Persea americana Mill.). J Hortic Sci Biotechnol 8:106–112
Torres AM, T Mau-Lastovicka, R
Rezaaiyan (1987). Total phenolics and high-performance liquid chromatography of
phenolic acids of avocado. J Agric Food Chem 3:921–925
Tremocoldi
MA, PL Rosalen, M Franchin, AP Massarioli, C Denny,
ÉR Daiuto, JAR Paschoal, PS Melo, SMD Alencar (2018). Exploration of avocado
by-products as natural sources of bioactive compounds. PLoS
One 13:1–12
Tugiyanti
E, N Iriyanti, YS Apriyanto (2019). The effect of
avocado seed powder (Persea americana Mill.) on the liver and kidney
functions and meat quality of culled female quail (Coturnix coturnix
japonica). Vet World 12:1608–1615
Tusevski
O, A Kostovska, A Iloska, L
Trajkovska, SG Simic (2014). Phenolic production and
antioxidant properties of some Macedonian medicinal plants. Centr
Eur J Biol 9:888–900
Uchenna
UE, AB Shori, AS Baba (2017). Inclusion of avocado (Persea
americana) seeds in the diet to improve carbohydrate and lipid metabolism
in rats. Rev Argent
Endocrinol Metabol
54:140–148
Umar AZ, UA Umar, SM Dambazau, A
Sulaiman (2016). Comparative hepatotoxic
effects
of
aqueous
and
phenolic
extracts
of avocado (Persea americana) seed in wistar albino rats. Intl J Biochem Res Rev 10:1–6
Vo TS, PU Le, DH Ngo (2019). Free
radical scavenging and anti-proliferative activities of avocado (Persea
americana Mill.) seed extract. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed 9:91
Wang W, TR Bostic, L Gu (2010).
Antioxidant capacities, procyanidins and pigments in avocados of different
strains and cultivars. Food Chem 122:1193–1198
Wen AP, Delaquis, K Stanich, P
Toivonen (2003). Antilisterial activity of selected phenolic acids. Food
Microbiol 20:305–311